LQQ.PA vs. CL2.F

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LQQ.PA (Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index, while CL2.F (CyberAgent, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, LQQ.PA returned 35.63%/yr vs 3.19%/yr for CL2.F. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LQQ.PA vs. CL2.F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) and CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQQ.PA achieves a 39.94% return, which is significantly higher than CL2.F's 2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LQQ.PA has outperformed CL2.F with an annualized return of 35.63%, while CL2.F has yielded a comparatively lower 3.19% annualized return.

LQQ.PA

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: 17.97%
• YTD: 39.94%
• 6M: 36.85%
• 1Y: 79.18%
• 3Y*: 44.82%
• 5Y*: 26.89%
• 10Y*: 35.63%

CL2.F

• 1D: -1.99%
• 1M: 10.45%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: -2.63%
• 1Y: -20.00%
• 3Y*: 2.37%
• 5Y*: -13.96%
• 10Y*: 3.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQQ.PA vs. CL2.F - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage	39.94%	14.16%	57.02%	112.33%	-59.20%	71.22%	74.17%	83.28%	-3.57%	48.53%
CL2.F CyberAgent, Inc.	2.07%	9.85%	14.79%	-29.87%	-43.83%	5.23%	79.04%	-6.54%	2.55%	36.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LQQ.PA and CL2.F is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2007	0.12

The correlation between LQQ.PA and CL2.F shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LQQ.PA vs. CL2.F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQQ.PA

LQQ.PA Risk / Return Rank: 71
LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
LQQ.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
LQQ.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LQQ.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
LQQ.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CL2.F

CL2.F Risk / Return Rank: 20
CL2.F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
CL2.F Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
CL2.F Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CL2.F Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CL2.F Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQQ.PA vs. CL2.F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) and CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LQQ.PA	CL2.F	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	-0.56	+3.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	-0.64	+3.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.93	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	-0.53	+4.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.13	-0.83	+11.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LQQ.PA vs. CL2.F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the CL2.F Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQQ.PA and CL2.F, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LQQ.PA	CL2.F	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	-0.56	+3.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	-0.35	+1.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	0.08	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.19	+0.51

Drawdowns

LQQ.PA vs. CL2.F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQQ.PA drawdown since its inception was -75.86%, roughly equal to the maximum CL2.F drawdown of -74.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQQ.PA and CL2.F.

Drawdown Indicators

	LQQ.PA	CL2.F	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.86%	-74.57%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.88%	-37.73%	+15.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.33%	-37.73%	-6.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.21%	-73.62%	+12.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.21%	-73.62%	+12.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-59.33%	+57.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.73%	-31.61%	+15.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.05%	24.07%	-17.02%

Volatility

LQQ.PA vs. CL2.F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) is 9.10%, while CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F) has a volatility of 13.31%. This indicates that LQQ.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CL2.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LQQ.PA	CL2.F	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.10%	13.31%	-4.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.37%	26.76%	-4.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.71%	35.55%	-4.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.78%	39.09%	+0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.87%	40.48%	-1.61%

Dividends

LQQ.PA vs. CL2.F - Dividend Comparison

LQQ.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CL2.F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CL2.F CyberAgent, Inc.	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.01%
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LQQ.PA and CL2.F in my portfolio?

LQQ.PA and CL2.F have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.