CL2.F vs. QQQ3.L
Compare and contrast key facts about CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L).
QQQ3.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). It was launched on Dec 13, 2012.
Performance
CL2.F vs. QQQ3.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CL2.F vs. QQQ3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL2.F CyberAgent, Inc. | 0.69% | 9.85% | 14.79% | -29.87% | -43.83% | 5.23% | 79.04% | -6.54% | 2.55% | 36.44% |
QQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged | -18.31% | 12.49% | 70.46% | 200.22% | -78.32% | 101.39% | 92.81% | 134.09% | -17.60% | 87.94% |
Different Trading Currencies
CL2.F is traded in EUR, while QQQ3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ3.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CL2.F achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ3.L's -18.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CL2.F has underperformed QQQ3.L with an annualized return of 3.92%, while QQQ3.L has yielded a comparatively higher 34.55% annualized return.
CL2.F
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- -25.89%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- -1.54%
- 5Y*
- -13.97%
- 10Y*
- 3.92%
QQQ3.L
- 1D
- 9.59%
- 1M
- -9.92%
- YTD
- -18.31%
- 6M
- -15.55%
- 1Y
- 36.24%
- 3Y*
- 42.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 34.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CL2.F vs. QQQ3.L — Risk / Return Rank
CL2.F
QQQ3.L
CL2.F vs. QQQ3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CL2.F | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.09 | 0.62 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.44 | 1.20 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.16 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 0.97 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | 2.94 | -2.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CL2.F | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 | 0.62 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | 0.22 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.58 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.73 | -0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between CL2.F and QQQ3.L is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CL2.F vs. QQQ3.L - Dividend Comparison
CL2.F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while QQQ3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL2.F CyberAgent, Inc. | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
QQQ3.L WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CL2.F vs. QQQ3.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CL2.F drawdown since its inception was -99.87%, which is greater than QQQ3.L's maximum drawdown of -80.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CL2.F and QQQ3.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CL2.F | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.87% | -81.35% | -18.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.79% | -35.92% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.62% | -81.35% | +7.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.62% | -81.35% | +7.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.42% | -28.28% | -71.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.23% | -19.80% | -61.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.60% | 11.21% | +8.39% |
Volatility
CL2.F vs. QQQ3.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CyberAgent, Inc. (CL2.F) is 11.20%, while WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) has a volatility of 17.70%. This indicates that CL2.F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CL2.F | QQQ3.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.20% | 17.70% | -6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.95% | 35.26% | -9.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.67% | 58.91% | -20.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.80% | 61.03% | -21.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.31% | 59.14% | -18.83% |