LQDI vs. LQDH
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH).
LQDI and LQDH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LQDI is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 8, 2018. LQDH is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 27, 2014.
Performance
LQDI vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LQDI vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | -0.54% | 8.84% | 1.48% | 8.85% | -15.33% | 7.53% | 11.82% | 15.83% | -2.07% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | -0.16% | 7.00% | 7.43% | 11.14% | -1.88% | 1.84% | 1.68% | 9.50% | -2.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDI achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH's -0.16% return.
LQDI
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 6.38%
- 3Y*
- 7.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LQDI vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
LQDI vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
LQDI
LQDH
LQDI vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDI | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 1.56 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 2.27 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.34 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.63 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.07 | 8.22 | -4.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDI | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.56 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 1.06 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.55 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDI and LQDH is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LQDI vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
LQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than LQDH's 6.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 4.57% | 4.46% | 4.65% | 3.98% | 3.27% | 2.42% | 2.34% | 3.26% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 6.13% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
Drawdowns
LQDI vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDI drawdown since its inception was -28.99%, which is greater than LQDH's maximum drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDI and LQDH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDI | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.99% | -24.63% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.03% | -3.85% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -7.08% | -13.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | -1.10% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -1.70% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 0.76% | +0.44% |
Volatility
LQDI vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) has a higher volatility of 2.19% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) at 1.51%. This indicates that LQDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LQDI | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.19% | 1.51% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.79% | 2.22% | +1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.01% | 4.10% | +1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 4.43% | +3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 6.45% | +4.49% |