PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQDE.L vs. IB01.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LQDE.L vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LQDE.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDE.L achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than IB01.L's 1.45% return.


LQDE.L

1D
0.48%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.75%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
5.02%
5Y*
0.00%
10Y*
2.55%

IB01.L

1D
0.03%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.45%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQDE.L vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LQDE.L
iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing
0.16%8.09%1.06%9.14%-17.80%-2.04%10.98%13.76%
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.45%4.34%5.25%4.92%1.08%0.00%0.88%2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between LQDE.L and IB01.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2019

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LQDE.L vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDE.L
LQDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
LQDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IB01.L
IB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
IB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
IB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
IB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
IB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDE.L vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LQDE.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQDE.LIB01.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-35.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

8.02

-6.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

115.45

-113.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

569.86

-565.08

LQDE.L vs. IB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the IB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 11.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDE.L and IB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQDE.LIB01.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

11.94

-10.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

9.24

-9.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

3.79

-3.38

Drawdowns

LQDE.L vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDE.L drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, which is greater than IB01.L's maximum drawdown of -0.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDE.L and IB01.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LQDE.LIB01.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-0.91%

-31.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-0.03%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.93%

-0.09%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-0.29%

-24.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

0.00%

-3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-0.08%

-4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

0.01%

+1.15%

Volatility

LQDE.L vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LQDE.L) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 0.10%. This indicates that LQDE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LQDE.LIB01.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

0.10%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.32%

0.24%

+4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.76%

0.33%

+5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.44%

0.37%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.67%

0.72%

+7.95%

LQDE.L vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LQDE.L vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison

LQDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, while IB01.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LQDE.L
iShares $ Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD Distributing
4.95%4.89%5.02%4.58%3.74%2.68%2.77%3.42%3.69%3.25%3.40%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


LQDE.L and IB01.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LQDE.L.

LQDE.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IB01.L is Government Bonds. LQDE.L tracks Morningstar US Corporate Bond TR USD, while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LQDE.L and 0.07% for IB01.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LQDE.L and IB01.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer