LQDB vs. IBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

LQDB (iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LQDB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade BBB 0+ Index , while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LQDB returned 3.94% vs -47.60% for IBIT. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQDB charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

LQDB vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDB achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -29.06% return.

LQDB

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -0.99%
• 6M: -0.20%
• YTD: 0.05%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: 5.12%
• 5Y*: 0.29%
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: -2.28%
• 6M: -32.10%
• YTD: -29.06%
• 1Y: -47.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQDB vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LQDB iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF	0.05%	7.50%	3.25%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-29.06%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between LQDB and IBIT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.12

Return for Risk

LQDB vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDB

LQDB Risk / Return Rank: 33
LQDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
LQDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
LQDB Omega Ratio Rank: 30
LQDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
LQDB Martin Ratio Rank: 37

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 1
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 1
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDB vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LQDB	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	-1.08	+2.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	-1.65	+3.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	0.82	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	-0.90	+2.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.48	-1.46	+5.93

LQDB vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDB Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDB and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LQDB vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDB drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDB and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LQDB	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.63%	-53.30%	+31.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.67%	-53.30%	+50.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-50.60%	+49.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.77%	-17.56%	+9.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	32.72%	-31.84%

Volatility

LQDB vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) is 1.32%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 11.51%. This indicates that LQDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LQDB	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.32%	11.51%	-10.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.28%	34.79%	-31.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.09%	44.38%	-40.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.87%	49.97%	-43.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.81%	49.97%	-43.16%

LQDB vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LQDB vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

LQDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LQDB iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF	4.76%	4.65%	4.46%	3.90%	4.14%	1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LQDB and IBIT in my portfolio?

LQDB and IBIT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LQDB or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to LQDB (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDB dropped -21.63% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

Which ETF is better, LQDB or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, LQDB leads with 3.94% vs -47.60% for IBIT. On fees, LQDB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, LQDB has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LQDB or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, LQDB has performed better with a 3.94% return vs -47.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LQDB or IBIT?

LQDB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LQDB or IBIT?

LQDB has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between LQDB and IBIT?

LQDB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. LQDB tracks iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade BBB 0+ Index , while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LQDB and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.