PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LQDB vs. LQDH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQDB and LQDH is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

LQDB vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.28%
5.28%
LQDB
LQDH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDB:

1.02

LQDH:

3.10

Sortino Ratio

LQDB:

1.47

LQDH:

4.57

Omega Ratio

LQDB:

1.18

LQDH:

1.67

Calmar Ratio

LQDB:

0.42

LQDH:

4.45

Martin Ratio

LQDB:

3.28

LQDH:

23.06

Ulcer Index

LQDB:

1.62%

LQDH:

0.35%

Daily Std Dev

LQDB:

5.22%

LQDH:

2.62%

Max Drawdown

LQDB:

-21.63%

LQDH:

-24.63%

Current Drawdown

LQDB:

-6.65%

LQDH:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDB achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH's 1.69% return.


LQDB

YTD

1.01%

1M

0.89%

6M

-0.28%

1Y

5.33%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LQDH

YTD

1.69%

1M

1.00%

6M

5.28%

1Y

7.89%

5Y*

4.49%

10Y*

3.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQDB vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQDB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


LQDH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
Expense ratio chart for LQDH: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for LQDB: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDB vs. LQDH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDB is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDB is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDB is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDB is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDB is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDB is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDH is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDH is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDH is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDH is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDH is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDH is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDB vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDB, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.023.10
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDB, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.474.57
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDB, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.181.67
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDB, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.424.45
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDB, currently valued at 3.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.2823.06
LQDB
LQDH

The current LQDB Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the LQDH Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDB and LQDH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.02
3.10
LQDB
LQDH

Dividends

LQDB vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison

LQDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than LQDH's 7.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LQDB
iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF
4.49%4.46%3.90%3.25%1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LQDH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
7.21%7.57%7.69%3.73%1.64%2.22%3.09%5.08%2.37%2.33%2.98%2.19%

Drawdowns

LQDB vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDB drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDB and LQDH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.65%
0
LQDB
LQDH

Volatility

LQDB vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison

iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (LQDB) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) at 0.44%. This indicates that LQDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.35%
0.44%
LQDB
LQDH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab