LPXZX vs. FACVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LPXZX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX).
LPXZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Nov 29, 2015. FACVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 19, 2009.
Performance
LPXZX vs. FACVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LPXZX vs. FACVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPXZX Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund | -0.77% | 6.89% | 8.75% | 6.91% | -5.78% | 2.08% | 4.27% | 11.38% | -1.44% | 5.82% |
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A | 1.33% | 17.95% | 7.92% | 11.06% | -15.59% | 9.63% | 42.09% | 28.21% | -1.59% | 8.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPXZX achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than FACVX's 1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LPXZX has underperformed FACVX with an annualized return of 4.14%, while FACVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.83% annualized return.
LPXZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
FACVX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 24.20%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LPXZX vs. FACVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LPXZX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FACVX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LPXZX vs. FACVX — Risk / Return Rank
LPXZX
FACVX
LPXZX vs. FACVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LPXZX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LPXZX | FACVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 1.53 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.58 | 2.09 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.28 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.83 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.95 | 10.69 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LPXZX | FACVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.53 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.28 | 0.38 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | 0.80 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.92 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between LPXZX and FACVX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LPXZX vs. FACVX - Dividend Comparison
LPXZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than FACVX's 11.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPXZX Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund | 4.59% | 4.84% | 5.10% | 4.92% | 4.45% | 4.21% | 4.36% | 4.51% | 4.71% | 3.78% | 4.10% | 0.00% |
FACVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A | 11.04% | 11.18% | 1.85% | 1.86% | 3.48% | 20.42% | 10.56% | 3.04% | 9.55% | 3.89% | 4.62% | 10.02% |
Drawdowns
LPXZX vs. FACVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPXZX drawdown since its inception was -18.13%, smaller than the maximum FACVX drawdown of -25.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPXZX and FACVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPXZX | FACVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.13% | -25.09% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.14% | -7.75% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.69% | -24.32% | +14.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.13% | -25.09% | +6.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -6.79% | +4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -5.81% | +4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 2.05% | -1.55% |
Volatility
LPXZX vs. FACVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Low Duration Preferred and Income Fund (LPXZX) is 0.87%, while Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class A (FACVX) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that LPXZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FACVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LPXZX | FACVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 6.32% | -5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.40% | 12.07% | -10.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23% | 15.64% | -13.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.68% | 13.36% | -10.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 13.51% | -9.74% |