PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPX vs. NYT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LPX vs. NYT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) and The New York Times Company (NYT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPX achieves a -5.47% return, which is significantly lower than NYT's 4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, LPX has underperformed NYT with an annualized return of 17.84%, while NYT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.92% annualized return.


LPX

1D
-2.35%
1M
7.42%
YTD
-5.47%
6M
-7.40%
1Y
-11.27%
3Y*
5.12%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
17.84%

NYT

1D
-1.34%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
4.39%
6M
2.76%
1Y
33.85%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
20.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPX vs. NYT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LPX
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
-5.47%-21.05%47.93%21.55%-23.38%113.30%27.96%36.40%-13.75%38.72%
NYT
The New York Times Company
4.39%35.06%7.33%52.60%-32.16%-6.18%61.92%45.26%21.35%40.50%

Correlation

The correlation between LPX and NYT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1982

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between LPX and NYT has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LPX:

$5.30B

NYT:

$11.80B

EPS

LPX:

$1.17

NYT:

$2.33

PE Ratio

LPX:

64.66

NYT:

30.96

PS Ratio

LPX:

2.07

NYT:

4.08

PB Ratio

LPX:

3.06

NYT:

5.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

LPX:

$2.56B

NYT:

$2.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LPX:

$507.00M

NYT:

$1.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

LPX:

$247.00M

NYT:

$573.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPX vs. NYT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPX
LPX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
LPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
LPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NYT
NYT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NYT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPX vs. NYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) and The New York Times Company (NYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LPXNYTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.27

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

2.12

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

5.26

-5.85

LPX vs. NYT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPX Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the NYT Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPX and NYT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LPX vs. NYT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPX drawdown since its inception was -96.41%, roughly equal to the maximum NYT drawdown of -92.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPX and NYT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPXNYTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.41%

-92.09%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.83%

-16.05%

-17.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.14%

-19.67%

-23.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.14%

-49.83%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.45%

-49.93%

-9.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.74%

-16.05%

-19.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.86%

-32.17%

-5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.03%

6.45%

+12.58%

Volatility

LPX vs. NYT - Volatility Comparison

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) has a higher volatility of 10.32% compared to The New York Times Company (NYT) at 6.01%. This indicates that LPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPXNYTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.32%

6.01%

+4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.01%

19.61%

+12.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.82%

28.83%

+12.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.95%

29.42%

+10.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.89%

30.75%

+10.14%

Dividends

LPX vs. NYT - Dividend Comparison

LPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than NYT's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LPX
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
1.53%1.39%1.00%1.36%1.49%0.87%1.56%1.82%2.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NYT
The New York Times Company
1.07%0.97%0.96%0.86%1.05%0.56%0.44%0.59%0.72%0.86%1.20%1.19%

Financials

LPX vs. NYT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Louisiana-Pacific Corporation and The New York Times Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
574.00M
712.24M
(LPX) Total Revenue
(NYT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LPX vs. NYT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Louisiana-Pacific Corporation and The New York Times Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
20.0%
49.0%
Portfolio components
LPX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported a gross profit of 115.00M and revenue of 574.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

NYT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a gross profit of 349.30M and revenue of 712.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

LPX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported an operating income of 34.00M and revenue of 574.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

NYT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported an operating income of 90.62M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

LPX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported a net income of 27.00M and revenue of 574.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

NYT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a net income of 87.92M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LPX and NYT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LPX has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to NYT (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPX dropped -96.41% vs NYT's -92.09%.

NYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPX and NYT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer