LPX vs. MAS
LPX (Louisiana-Pacific Corporation) and MAS (Masco Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Building Products & Equipment industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, LPX returned 17.39%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for MAS. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LPX vs. MAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPX achieves a -6.35% return, which is significantly lower than MAS's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, LPX has outperformed MAS with an annualized return of 17.39%, while MAS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.99% annualized return.
LPX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- -6.35%
- 6M
- -12.73%
- 1Y
- -13.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
MAS
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 14.19%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
LPX vs. MAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPX Louisiana-Pacific Corporation | -6.35% | -21.05% | 47.93% | 21.55% | -23.38% | 113.30% | 27.96% | 36.40% | -13.75% | 38.72% |
MAS Masco Corporation | 17.72% | -10.92% | 10.04% | 46.56% | -32.09% | 29.61% | 15.78% | 66.27% | -32.70% | 40.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPX and MAS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 1983 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, LPX and MAS have become more correlated (0.63) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LPX:
$5.25B
MAS:
$15.02B
LPX:
$1.17
MAS:
$4.02
LPX:
64.06
MAS:
18.39
LPX:
2.05
MAS:
2.00
LPX:
$2.56B
MAS:
$7.68B
LPX:
$507.00M
MAS:
$2.72B
LPX:
$247.00M
MAS:
$1.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPX vs. MAS — Risk / Return Rank
LPX
MAS
LPX vs. MAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) and Masco Corporation (MAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LPX | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.12 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 0.75 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 1.54 | -2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LPX vs. MAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPX drawdown since its inception was -96.41%, which is greater than MAS's maximum drawdown of -88.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPX and MAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPX | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.41% | -88.75% | -7.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.83% | -24.38% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.14% | -30.95% | -12.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.14% | -37.95% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.45% | -44.83% | -14.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.34% | -10.89% | -25.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.86% | -23.63% | -14.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.73% | 11.82% | +6.91% |
Volatility
LPX vs. MAS - Volatility Comparison
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) has a higher volatility of 13.37% compared to Masco Corporation (MAS) at 9.83%. This indicates that LPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPX | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.37% | 9.83% | +3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.61% | 25.92% | +5.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.58% | 32.41% | +9.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.89% | 30.03% | +9.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.85% | 29.44% | +11.41% |
Dividends
LPX vs. MAS - Dividend Comparison
LPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than MAS's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPX Louisiana-Pacific Corporation | 1.55% | 1.39% | 1.00% | 1.36% | 1.49% | 0.87% | 1.56% | 1.82% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAS Masco Corporation | 1.70% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.70% | 2.40% | 1.20% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 1.49% | 0.92% | 1.22% | 12.68% |
Financials
LPX vs. MAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Louisiana-Pacific Corporation and Masco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LPX vs. MAS - Profitability Comparison
LPX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported a gross profit of 115.00M and revenue of 574.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
MAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported a gross profit of 686.00M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.
LPX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported an operating income of 34.00M and revenue of 574.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
MAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported an operating income of 316.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
LPX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation reported a net income of 27.00M and revenue of 574.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
MAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported a net income of 213.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LPX and MAS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LPX has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to MAS (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPX dropped -96.41% vs MAS's -88.75%.
MAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LPX and MAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer