LPWRX vs. LTFIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LPWRX (BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund) and LTFIX (Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, LPWRX returned 8.42%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for LTFIX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LPWRX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTFIX.

Performance

LPWRX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPWRX achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly higher than LTFIX's 6.75% return.

LPWRX

• 1D: -2.27%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 10.30%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 23.30%
• 3Y*: 16.76%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: —

LTFIX

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 17.19%
• 3Y*: 17.44%
• 5Y*: 8.56%
• 10Y*: 11.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPWRX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LPWRX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund	10.30%	20.43%	8.99%	22.14%	-18.94%	17.84%	13.47%	5.28%
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund	6.75%	17.80%	17.28%	20.33%	-18.84%	17.73%	16.47%	5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LPWRX and LTFIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019	0.94

The correlation between LPWRX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LPWRX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPWRX

LPWRX Risk / Return Rank: 47
LPWRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
LPWRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
LPWRX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
LPWRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
LPWRX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

LTFIX

LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 37
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPWRX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LPWRX	LTFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.49	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	2.11	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.27	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	2.17	+0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.61	9.48	+1.13

LPWRX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPWRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPWRX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LPWRX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPWRX drawdown since its inception was -33.27%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPWRX and LTFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LPWRX	LTFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.27%	-52.73%	+19.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.07%	-8.71%	-1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.36%	-15.70%	-5.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.28%	-26.80%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.06%	-2.66%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.40%	-7.62%	+1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	1.98%	+0.38%

Volatility

LPWRX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) at 5.17%. This indicates that LPWRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LPWRX	LTFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.47%	5.17%	+1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.77%	10.48%	+2.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.29%	12.66%	+2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.15%	15.59%	+1.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.67%	15.82%	+2.85%

LPWRX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LPWRX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

LPWRX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

LPWRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than LTFIX's 8.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LPWRX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund	2.05%	2.26%	1.00%	2.07%	2.35%	9.34%	1.00%	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund	8.18%	8.73%	8.47%	4.17%	8.60%	5.83%	3.91%	6.03%	6.60%	3.51%	3.99%	4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LPWRX and LTFIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, LPWRX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LPWRX or LTFIX?

LPWRX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to LTFIX (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPWRX dropped -33.27% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LPWRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.