PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPWRX vs. FHDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LPWRX vs. FHDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPWRX achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly lower than FHDDX's 13.30% return.


LPWRX

1D
-0.98%
1M
3.50%
YTD
12.66%
6M
13.42%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*

FHDDX

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.66%
YTD
13.30%
6M
14.54%
1Y
29.84%
3Y*
21.24%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPWRX vs. FHDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LPWRX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund
12.66%20.43%8.99%22.14%-18.94%17.84%13.47%5.28%
FHDDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6
13.30%22.85%16.77%20.77%-18.91%16.49%18.00%6.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LPWRX and FHDDX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2019

0.95

The correlation between LPWRX and FHDDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPWRX vs. FHDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPWRX
LPWRX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LPWRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPWRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPWRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LPWRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPWRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FHDDX
FHDDX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FHDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FHDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPWRX vs. FHDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LPWRXFHDDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.16

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

14.03

-1.72

LPWRX vs. FHDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPWRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FHDDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPWRX and FHDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LPWRXFHDDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.41

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.70

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.73

-0.10

Drawdowns

LPWRX vs. FHDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPWRX drawdown since its inception was -33.27%, which is greater than FHDDX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPWRX and FHDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPWRXFHDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.27%

-31.34%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-9.70%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.36%

-15.50%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.28%

-27.68%

+0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-0.65%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-5.84%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.18%

+0.12%

Volatility

LPWRX vs. FHDDX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6 (FHDDX) have volatilities of 4.25% and 4.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPWRXFHDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

4.26%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.44%

10.47%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

12.76%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

15.13%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

16.91%

+1.69%

LPWRX vs. FHDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LPWRX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FHDDX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

LPWRX vs. FHDDX - Dividend Comparison

LPWRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than FHDDX's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHDDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2055 Fund Class K6
3.33%2.49%5.24%2.04%6.20%8.33%4.63%3.09%3.76%
LPWRX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund
2.01%2.26%1.00%2.07%2.35%9.34%1.00%0.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, LPWRX and FHDDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHDDX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to LPWRX (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPWRX dropped -33.27% vs FHDDX's -31.34%.

FHDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPWRX and FHDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer