PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPWRX vs. FDFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LPWRX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LPWRX having a 11.74% return and FDFPX slightly higher at 12.26%.


LPWRX

1D
2.72%
1M
0.23%
6M
8.13%
YTD
11.74%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.18%

FDFPX

1D
2.29%
1M
-0.99%
6M
8.37%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LPWRX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LPWRX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund
11.74%20.43%8.99%22.14%-18.94%17.84%13.47%5.28%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
12.26%22.81%17.81%20.93%-18.57%16.84%18.54%6.50%

Correlation

The correlation between LPWRX and FDFPX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019

0.95

The correlation between LPWRX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPWRX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LPWRX
LPWRX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LPWRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPWRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPWRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
LPWRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPWRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFPX
FDFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LPWRX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LPWRXFDFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.40

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

10.04

-1.13

LPWRX vs. FDFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPWRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the FDFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPWRX and FDFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LPWRX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPWRX drawdown since its inception was -33.27%, which is greater than FDFPX's maximum drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPWRX and FDFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPWRXFDFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.27%

-31.22%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-9.54%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.36%

-15.42%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.28%

-27.41%

+0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-2.19%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-5.76%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.28%

+0.18%

Volatility

LPWRX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund (LPWRX) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) at 4.37%. This indicates that LPWRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPWRXFDFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.37%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

12.20%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

14.21%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

15.34%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

17.21%

+1.40%

LPWRX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LPWRX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

LPWRX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison

LPWRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than FDFPX's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.81%2.87%6.56%2.22%5.41%8.52%5.38%3.19%
LPWRX
BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2065 Fund
2.04%2.26%1.00%2.07%2.35%9.34%1.00%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, LPWRX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LPWRX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to FDFPX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPWRX dropped -33.27% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.

FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPWRX and FDFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer