LPLA vs. COKE
LPLA (LPL Financial Holdings Inc.) and COKE (Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.) are both stocks. LPLA operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while COKE operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LPLA returned 30.16%/yr vs 31.81%/yr for COKE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LPLA vs. COKE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPLA achieves a -17.05% return, which is significantly lower than COKE's 22.93% return. Over the past 10 years, LPLA has underperformed COKE with an annualized return of 30.16%, while COKE has yielded a comparatively higher 31.81% annualized return.
LPLA
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -17.05%
- 6M
- -22.23%
- 1Y
- -20.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 30.16%
COKE
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 10.35%
- YTD
- 22.93%
- 6M
- 13.67%
- 1Y
- 74.22%
- 3Y*
- 43.83%
- 5Y*
- 35.39%
- 10Y*
- 31.81%
LPLA vs. COKE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | -17.05% | 9.76% | 44.12% | 5.88% | 35.69% | 54.63% | 14.58% | 52.95% | 8.53% | 66.03% |
COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 22.93% | 22.63% | 38.75% | 82.92% | -17.09% | 133.24% | -5.87% | 60.74% | -17.10% | 20.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPLA and COKE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010 | 0.21 |
The correlation between LPLA and COKE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LPLA:
$23.78B
COKE:
$12.52B
LPLA:
$11.30
COKE:
$7.14
LPLA:
26.17
COKE:
26.33
LPLA:
1.10
COKE:
0.54
LPLA:
1.29
COKE:
2.03
LPLA:
$18.26B
COKE:
$7.49B
LPLA:
$7.58B
COKE:
$2.95B
LPLA:
$2.23B
COKE:
$1.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPLA vs. COKE — Risk / Return Rank
LPLA
COKE
LPLA vs. COKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LPLA | COKE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.36 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 2.96 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 8.68 | -10.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LPLA vs. COKE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPLA drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, which is greater than COKE's maximum drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPLA and COKE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPLA | COKE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.32% | -54.32% | -15.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.12% | -24.56% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -27.38% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.18% | -35.52% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.34% | -51.71% | -8.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.63% | -13.27% | -12.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -18.88% | +4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.17% | 8.36% | +7.81% |
Volatility
LPLA vs. COKE - Volatility Comparison
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) have volatilities of 9.76% and 10.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPLA | COKE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 10.16% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.80% | 29.90% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.17% | 34.84% | +1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.05% | 37.53% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.10% | 37.18% | +0.92% |
Dividends
LPLA vs. COKE - Dividend Comparison
LPLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than COKE's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COKE Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. | 0.53% | 0.65% | 1.59% | 0.54% | 0.20% | 0.16% | 0.38% | 0.35% | 0.56% | 0.46% | 0.56% | 0.55% |
LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 0.41% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 0.46% | 0.62% | 0.96% | 1.08% | 1.64% | 1.75% | 2.84% | 2.34% |
Financials
LPLA vs. COKE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LPL Financial Holdings Inc. and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LPLA vs. COKE - Profitability Comparison
LPLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.52B and revenue of 4.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.5%.
COKE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported a gross profit of 727.08M and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
LPLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
COKE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported an operating income of 237.52M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.
LPLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 356.40M and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
COKE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported a net income of 111.56M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LPLA and COKE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COKE has higher volatility (10.16%) compared to LPLA (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPLA dropped -69.32% vs COKE's -54.32%.
COKE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LPLA and COKE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer