LPLA vs. SCHW
LPLA (LPL Financial Holdings Inc.) and SCHW (The Charles Schwab Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Capital Markets industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, LPLA returned 30.49%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for SCHW. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LPLA vs. SCHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LPLA achieves a -17.21% return, which is significantly lower than SCHW's -6.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LPLA has outperformed SCHW with an annualized return of 30.49%, while SCHW has yielded a comparatively lower 15.01% annualized return.
LPLA
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- -17.21%
- 6M
- -21.00%
- 1Y
- -20.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- 16.75%
- 10Y*
- 30.49%
SCHW
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -7.27%
- 1Y
- 6.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
LPLA vs. SCHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | -17.21% | 9.76% | 44.12% | 5.88% | 35.69% | 54.63% | 14.58% | 52.95% | 8.53% | 66.03% |
SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | -6.10% | 36.65% | 9.17% | -15.97% | 0.11% | 60.23% | 13.57% | 16.38% | -18.43% | 31.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LPLA and SCHW is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2010 | 0.61 |
The correlation between LPLA and SCHW shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LPLA:
$23.74B
SCHW:
$163.23B
LPLA:
$11.30
SCHW:
$5.26
LPLA:
26.12
SCHW:
17.71
LPLA:
1.10
SCHW:
1.01
LPLA:
1.29
SCHW:
6.90
LPLA:
4.18
SCHW:
60.46K
LPLA:
$18.26B
SCHW:
$24.17B
LPLA:
$7.58B
SCHW:
$18.86B
LPLA:
$2.23B
SCHW:
$13.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LPLA vs. SCHW — Risk / Return Rank
LPLA
SCHW
LPLA vs. SCHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) and The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LPLA | SCHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.07 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 0.34 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 0.78 | -2.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LPLA vs. SCHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LPLA drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, smaller than the maximum SCHW drawdown of -86.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPLA and SCHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LPLA | SCHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.32% | -86.79% | +17.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.12% | -19.83% | -13.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -27.11% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.18% | -49.70% | +16.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.34% | -51.08% | -9.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.77% | -12.49% | -13.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.94% | -35.52% | +21.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.62% | 8.73% | +7.89% |
Volatility
LPLA vs. SCHW - Volatility Comparison
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) at 8.14%. This indicates that LPLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LPLA | SCHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 8.14% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.87% | 20.17% | +7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.40% | 24.45% | +11.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.02% | 32.17% | +3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.94% | 33.20% | +4.74% |
Dividends
LPLA vs. SCHW - Dividend Comparison
LPLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than SCHW's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPLA LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | 0.41% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 0.46% | 0.62% | 0.96% | 1.08% | 1.64% | 1.75% | 2.84% | 2.34% |
SCHW The Charles Schwab Corporation | 1.27% | 1.08% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.01% | 0.86% | 1.36% | 1.43% | 1.11% | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.73% |
Financials
LPLA vs. SCHW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LPL Financial Holdings Inc. and The Charles Schwab Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LPLA vs. SCHW - Profitability Comparison
LPLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.52B and revenue of 4.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.5%.
SCHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 3.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
LPLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
SCHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported an operating income of -730.00M and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.2%.
LPLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LPL Financial Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 356.40M and revenue of 4.94B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
SCHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Charles Schwab Corporation reported a net income of 2.48B and revenue of 3.14B, resulting in a net margin of 78.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LPLA and SCHW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LPLA has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to SCHW (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPLA dropped -69.32% vs SCHW's -86.79%.
SCHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LPLA and SCHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer