PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPL vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LPL vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPL achieves a 36.82% return, which is significantly higher than META's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, LPL has underperformed META with an annualized return of -5.37%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.


LPL

1D
0.35%
1M
33.33%
YTD
36.82%
6M
30.61%
1Y
82.28%
3Y*
-2.58%
5Y*
-11.30%
10Y*
-5.37%

META

1D
4.24%
1M
2.06%
YTD
-5.54%
6M
-2.44%
1Y
-6.29%
3Y*
32.06%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPL vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LPL
LG Display Co., Ltd.
36.82%37.13%-36.31%-2.82%-50.89%22.88%21.61%-15.26%-40.48%7.08%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-5.54%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LPL and META is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LPL:

$5.76B

META:

$1.60T

EPS

LPL:

-$86.68

META:

$27.47

PS Ratio

LPL:

0.00

META:

7.45

PB Ratio

LPL:

0.00

META:

6.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

LPL:

$25.28T

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LPL:

$3.40T

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

LPL:

$5.83T

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPL vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPL
LPL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPL vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LPLMETADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

-0.18

+1.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

-0.01

+1.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.00

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

-0.19

+2.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.81

-0.41

+5.21

LPL vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPL Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPL and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LPLMETADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

-0.18

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.31

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

0.47

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.56

-0.64

Drawdowns

LPL vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPL drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than META's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPL and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPLMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.80%

-76.74%

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.80%

-33.30%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.50%

-34.15%

-27.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.96%

-76.74%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.42%

-76.74%

-7.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.30%

-20.96%

-58.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.45%

-15.25%

-42.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.18%

15.47%

+1.71%

Volatility

LPL vs. META - Volatility Comparison

LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) has a higher volatility of 29.23% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 8.84%. This indicates that LPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPLMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.23%

8.84%

+20.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.88%

26.58%

+23.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.01%

35.23%

+24.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.58%

43.99%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.05%

38.64%

+4.41%

Dividends

LPL vs. META - Dividend Comparison

LPL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LPL
LG Display Co., Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.71%2.06%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.34%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LPL vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LG Display Co., Ltd. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T20222023202420252026
5.53T
56.31B
(LPL) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LPL vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LG Display Co., Ltd. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
13.8%
81.9%
Portfolio components
LPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LG Display Co., Ltd. reported a gross profit of 765.49B and revenue of 5.53T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

LPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LG Display Co., Ltd. reported an operating income of 146.72B and revenue of 5.53T, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

LPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LG Display Co., Ltd. reported a net income of -575.71B and revenue of 5.53T, resulting in a net margin of -10.4%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LPL and META have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LPL has higher volatility (29.23%) compared to META (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPL dropped -90.80% vs META's -76.74%.

LPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPL and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer