PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LPL vs. VST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LPL vs. VST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) and Vistra Corp. (VST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LPL achieves a -5.23% return, which is significantly lower than VST's 1.23% return.


LPL

1D
-3.62%
1M
-20.99%
YTD
-5.23%
6M
-6.56%
1Y
11.76%
3Y*
-14.30%
5Y*
-17.38%
10Y*
-8.84%

VST

1D
0.30%
1M
4.37%
YTD
1.23%
6M
0.84%
1Y
-12.06%
3Y*
88.40%
5Y*
57.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LPL vs. VST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LPL
LG Display Co., Ltd.
-5.23%37.13%-36.31%-2.82%-50.89%22.88%21.61%-15.26%-40.48%7.08%
VST
Vistra Corp.
1.23%17.66%261.52%70.73%5.08%19.57%-11.87%2.46%24.95%18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LPL and VST is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016

0.21

Fundamentals

EPS

LPL:

-₩86.68

VST:

$8.60

PS Ratio

LPL:

0.24

VST:

2.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

LPL:

₩25.28T

VST:

$17.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LPL:

₩3.40T

VST:

$1.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

LPL:

₩5.83T

VST:

$4.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LPL vs. VST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LPL
LPL Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LPL Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VST
VST Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VST Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VST Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LPL vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LPLVSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.00

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

-0.32

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.66

-0.57

+1.23

LPL vs. VST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is higher than the VST Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LPL and VST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LPL vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LPL drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than VST's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LPL and VST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LPLVSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.80%

-53.32%

-37.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.80%

-38.01%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.97%

-48.80%

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.96%

-48.80%

-27.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.66%

-24.95%

-60.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.51%

-13.75%

-43.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.86%

21.18%

-3.32%

Volatility

LPL vs. VST - Volatility Comparison

LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL) has a higher volatility of 26.08% compared to Vistra Corp. (VST) at 13.63%. This indicates that LPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LPLVSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.08%

13.63%

+12.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.48%

36.84%

+16.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.83%

48.92%

+13.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.28%

48.03%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.37%

42.22%

+1.15%

Dividends

LPL vs. VST - Dividend Comparison

LPL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LPL
LG Display Co., Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.71%2.06%
VST
Vistra Corp.
0.56%0.56%0.63%2.13%3.12%2.64%2.75%2.17%0.00%0.00%14.97%0.00%

Financials

LPL vs. VST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LG Display Co., Ltd. and Vistra Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T20222023202420252026
5.53T
5.64B
(LPL) Total Revenue
(VST) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LPL values in KRW, VST values in USD

LPL vs. VST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between LG Display Co., Ltd. and Vistra Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-80.0%-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
13.8%
0
Portfolio components
LPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LG Display Co., Ltd. reported a gross profit of 765.49B and revenue of 5.53T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.

VST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LG Display Co., Ltd. reported an operating income of 146.72B and revenue of 5.53T, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

VST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

LPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LG Display Co., Ltd. reported a net income of -575.71B and revenue of 5.53T, resulting in a net margin of -10.4%.

VST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LPL and VST have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LPL has higher volatility (26.08%) compared to VST (13.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LPL dropped -90.80% vs VST's -53.32%.

LPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LPL and VST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer