LOWV vs. SPMV
LOWV (AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF) and SPMV (Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOWV is a Low Volatility fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while SPMV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. LOWV is actively managed, while SPMV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LOWV charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for SPMV.
Performance
LOWV vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LOWV
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 1Y
- 11.55%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.14%
SPMV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $248.27K | $453.80K | $603.81K |
LOWV vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 5.85% | 12.26% | 20.43% | 18.90% |
SPMV Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | 0.87% | 11.69% | 18.78% | 11.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOWV and SPMV is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LOWV and SPMV has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
LOWV vs. SPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LOWV
SPMV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
LOWV
SPMV
Financial Services
LOWV
SPMV
Healthcare
LOWV
SPMV
Communication Services
LOWV
SPMV
Consumer Cyclical
LOWV
SPMV
Industrials
LOWV
SPMV
Consumer Defensive
LOWV
SPMV
Utilities
LOWV
SPMV
Energy
LOWV
SPMV
Real Estate
LOWV
SPMV
Basic Materials
LOWV
-
SPMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOWV vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank
LOWV
SPMV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LOWV vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOWV | SPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOWV vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOWV | SPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | — | — |
Volatility
LOWV vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOWV | SPMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.87% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.87% | — | — |
LOWV vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOWV has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOWV vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison
LOWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while SPMV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF | 0.86% | 0.85% | 0.92% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMV Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF | 1.05% | 1.53% | 1.53% | 2.28% | 1.79% | 1.28% | 1.71% | 3.13% | 2.11% | 1.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOWV and SPMV have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for LOWV.
SPMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.86% for LOWV.
LOWV is categorized as Low Volatility, while SPMV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for LOWV and 0.10% for SPMV.
Find the right allocation for LOWV and SPMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer