LOWV vs. COMT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LOWV (AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LOWV returned 15.81%/yr vs 16.55%/yr for COMT. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.48% expense ratio.

Performance

LOWV vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOWV achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 38.58% return.

LOWV

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 3.60%
• 6M: 3.58%
• 1Y: 12.24%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMT

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -3.28%
• YTD: 38.58%
• 6M: 38.42%
• 1Y: 47.00%
• 3Y*: 16.55%
• 5Y*: 13.58%
• 10Y*: 9.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOWV vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF	3.60%	12.26%	20.43%	20.41%
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	38.58%	6.07%	5.96%	1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LOWV and COMT is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023	0.01

The correlation between LOWV and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LOWV vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LOWV	COMT
Technology	32.6%	-
Financial Services	14.9%	100.0%
Healthcare	11.4%	-
Communication Services	9.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	-
Industrials	7.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	-
Utilities	4.8%	-
Energy	2.4%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-

Return for Risk

LOWV vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOWV

LOWV Risk / Return Rank: 31
LOWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
LOWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
LOWV Omega Ratio Rank: 31
LOWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
LOWV Martin Ratio Rank: 34

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 72
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOWV vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOWV	COMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	2.22	-1.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	2.86	-1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.39	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	6.26	-4.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.34	14.93	-9.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOWV vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOWV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOWV and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOWV	COMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	2.22	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.50	0.20	+1.30

Drawdowns

LOWV vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOWV drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWV and COMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOWV	COMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.87%	-51.89%	+38.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-8.02%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.87%	-13.31%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-5.56%	+5.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-24.08%	+22.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	3.36%	-1.02%

Volatility

LOWV vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) is 2.04%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that LOWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOWV	COMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.04%	7.60%	-5.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.85%	18.80%	-10.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.44%	21.38%	-10.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.95%	21.07%	-9.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.95%	18.89%	-6.94%

LOWV vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LOWV and COMT have an expense ratio of 0.48%.

Dividends

LOWV vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

LOWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than COMT's 5.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	5.59%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF	0.90%	0.85%	0.92%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOWV and COMT in my portfolio?

LOWV and COMT have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOWV or COMT?

COMT has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to LOWV (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOWV dropped -13.87% vs COMT's -51.89%.

Which ETF is better, LOWV or COMT?

On 3-year performance, COMT leads with 16.55% vs 15.81% for LOWV. Both ETFs have the same 0.48% expense ratio. On volatility, LOWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LOWV or COMT?

Over the 3-year period, COMT has performed better with a 16.55% return vs 15.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOWV or COMT?

LOWV and COMT have the same expense ratio: 0.48% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOWV or COMT?

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.59%, compared with 0.90% for LOWV.

What is the main difference between LOWV and COMT?

LOWV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.