LOWD.DE vs. CBUG.DE
LOWD.DE (BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc) and CBUG.DE (iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds - LOWD.DE tracks the Low Carbon 300 World PAB while CBUG.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LOWD.DE returned 18.12%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for CBUG.DE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOWD.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CBUG.DE.
Performance
LOWD.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOWD.DE achieves a 14.74% return, which is significantly lower than CBUG.DE's 18.13% return.
LOWD.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 14.74%
- 6M
- 15.46%
- 1Y
- 22.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.12%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUG.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 33.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOWD.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOWD.DE BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc | 14.74% | 4.27% | 25.87% | 26.12% | -10.62% | 2.17% |
CBUG.DE iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) | 18.13% | 6.50% | 13.10% | 11.25% | -14.07% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOWD.DE and CBUG.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between LOWD.DE and CBUG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOWD.DE vs. CBUG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOWD.DE
CBUG.DE
LOWD.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOWD.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 4.55 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 17.38 | -8.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOWD.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.08%, smaller than the maximum CBUG.DE drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWD.DE and CBUG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOWD.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.08% | -24.57% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -7.24% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.08% | -24.57% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | 0.00% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -7.40% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 1.90% | +0.57% |
Volatility
LOWD.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) at 3.37%. This indicates that LOWD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOWD.DE | CBUG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 3.37% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.36% | 9.98% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 13.97% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 16.66% | -2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 16.66% | -2.46% |
LOWD.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOWD.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUG.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOWD.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOWD.DE nor CBUG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOWD.DE and CBUG.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LOWD.DE.
LOWD.DE tracks Low Carbon 300 World PAB, while CBUG.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOWD.DE and 0.10% for CBUG.DE.
Find the right allocation for LOWD.DE and CBUG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer