PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOWD.DE vs. ASRV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOWD.DE vs. ASRV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ESG Eurozone Biodiversity Leaders PAB UCITS ETF (ASRV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOWD.DE achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than ASRV.DE's -0.76% return.


LOWD.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
8.55%
YTD
10.58%
6M
11.62%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
10Y*

ASRV.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
6.28%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOWD.DE vs. ASRV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LOWD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc
10.58%4.27%25.87%26.12%6.50%
ASRV.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ESG Eurozone Biodiversity Leaders PAB UCITS ETF
-0.76%18.35%11.59%16.10%11.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LOWD.DE and ASRV.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022

0.72

The correlation between LOWD.DE and ASRV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOWD.DE vs. ASRV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOWD.DE
LOWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LOWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ASRV.DE
ASRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ASRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOWD.DE vs. ASRV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy ESG Eurozone Biodiversity Leaders PAB UCITS ETF (ASRV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOWD.DEASRV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.10

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

0.56

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

1.55

+5.00

LOWD.DE vs. ASRV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOWD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the ASRV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOWD.DE and ASRV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOWD.DEASRV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

0.48

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

1.05

-0.07

Drawdowns

LOWD.DE vs. ASRV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.08%, which is greater than ASRV.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOWD.DE and ASRV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOWD.DEASRV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.08%

-15.45%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-12.59%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

-15.45%

-3.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.14%

+8.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-2.66%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

4.56%

-2.07%

Volatility

LOWD.DE vs. ASRV.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy Low Carbon 300 World PAB UCITS ETF Acc (LOWD.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to BNP Paribas Easy ESG Eurozone Biodiversity Leaders PAB UCITS ETF (ASRV.DE) at 0.00%. This indicates that LOWD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASRV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOWD.DEASRV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

0.00%

+4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

11.06%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

14.60%

-2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

14.53%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

14.53%

-0.32%

LOWD.DE vs. ASRV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOWD.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ASRV.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOWD.DE vs. ASRV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOWD.DE nor ASRV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LOWD.DE and ASRV.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LOWD.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LOWD.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ASRV.DE.

LOWD.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while ASRV.DE is Europe Equities. LOWD.DE tracks Low Carbon 300 World PAB, while ASRV.DE tracks Euronext ESG Eurozone Biodiversity Leaders PAB. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOWD.DE and 0.35% for ASRV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOWD.DE and ASRV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer