PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOUP vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOUP vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOUP achieves a 20.89% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -6.69% return.


LOUP

1D
-0.93%
1M
5.80%
YTD
20.89%
6M
21.07%
1Y
63.99%
3Y*
32.56%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*

GDX

1D
2.97%
1M
-14.82%
YTD
-6.69%
6M
-5.89%
1Y
48.02%
3Y*
38.96%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
13.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOUP vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LOUP
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
20.89%43.24%21.80%51.31%-46.00%7.54%86.25%31.76%-18.86%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-6.69%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between LOUP and GDX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018

0.21

The correlation between LOUP and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOUP vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOUP
LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOUP vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOUPGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

1.40

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

3.87

+5.79

LOUP vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOUP Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOUP and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOUP vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOUP drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOUP and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOUPGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-80.34%

+21.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.00%

-36.28%

+15.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.23%

-36.28%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.63%

-46.51%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.47%

-30.91%

+23.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.99%

-40.41%

+20.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.31%

13.11%

-6.80%

Volatility

LOUP vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) is 11.16%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 17.20%. This indicates that LOUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOUPGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.16%

17.20%

-6.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.42%

39.15%

-15.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.60%

46.89%

-17.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.56%

36.74%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.03%

37.34%

-5.31%

LOUP vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOUP vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

LOUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.79%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
LOUP
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOUP and GDX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to LOUP (11.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOUP dropped -58.68% vs GDX's -80.34%.

On 5-year performance, GDX leads with 17.51% vs 11.27% for LOUP. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, LOUP has been the lower-risk option at 11.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GDX has performed better with a 17.51% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LOUP.

GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.00% for LOUP.

LOUP is categorized as Technology Equities, while GDX is Gold. LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LOUP and 0.51% for GDX.

LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOUP and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer