LOPP vs. MOO
LOPP (Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOPP is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. LOPP is actively managed, while MOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LOPP returned 7.80%/yr vs -0.70%/yr for MOO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOPP charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.
Performance
LOPP vs. MOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOPP achieves a 15.77% return, which is significantly higher than MOO's 10.10% return.
LOPP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 15.77%
- 6M
- 17.00%
- 1Y
- 33.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- —
MOO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 13.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.07%
- 5Y*
- -0.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.00%
LOPP vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF | 15.77% | 22.61% | 9.89% | 4.74% | -15.04% | 19.26% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 10.10% | 15.61% | -12.43% | -8.57% | -8.10% | 20.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOPP and MOO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2021 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LOPP and MOO has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
LOPP vs. MOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LOPP
MOO
Industrials
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
LOPP
MOO
Utilities
LOPP
MOO
-
Financial Services
LOPP
MOO
-
Consumer Cyclical
LOPP
MOO
-
Energy
LOPP
MOO
-
Basic Materials
LOPP
MOO
Technology
LOPP
MOO
-
Real Estate
LOPP
MOO
-
Communication Services
LOPP
MOO
-
Healthcare
LOPP
MOO
Consumer Defensive
LOPP
MOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOPP vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank
LOPP
MOO
LOPP vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOPP | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 0.95 | +1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 1.43 | +1.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.17 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 1.55 | +1.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 3.88 | +9.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOPP | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 0.95 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | -0.04 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.22 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
LOPP vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOPP drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOPP and MOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOPP | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -69.53% | +44.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.77% | -8.45% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.28% | -26.83% | +6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.28% | -39.52% | +14.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -17.50% | +17.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -16.97% | +8.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 3.37% | -0.78% |
Volatility
LOPP vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) at 4.08%. This indicates that LOPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOPP | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | 4.08% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.04% | 10.57% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.32% | 13.88% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 17.12% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 18.19% | -0.50% |
LOPP vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOPP has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOPP vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison
LOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than MOO's 2.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF | 0.72% | 0.83% | 1.88% | 2.23% | 2.01% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.24% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOPP and MOO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOPP has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to MOO (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOPP dropped -25.28% vs MOO's -69.53%.
On 5-year performance, LOPP leads with 7.80% vs -0.70% for MOO. On fees, LOPP is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LOPP has performed better with a 7.80% return vs -0.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOPP is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MOO.
MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.72% for LOPP.
LOPP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for LOPP and 0.55% for MOO.
LOPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOPP and MOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer