LOPP vs. MOO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

LOPP (Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOPP is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while MOO is a Natural Resources fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. LOPP is actively managed, while MOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LOPP returned 7.94%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for MOO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOPP charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for MOO.

Performance

LOPP vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOPP achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly higher than MOO's 11.94% return.

LOPP

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: 9.67%
• YTD: 14.81%
• 1Y: 26.03%
• 3Y*: 14.48%
• 5Y*: 7.94%
• 10Y*: —

MOO

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 3.68%
• 6M: 8.42%
• YTD: 11.94%
• 1Y: 12.19%
• 3Y*: 2.07%
• 5Y*: 0.16%
• 10Y*: 7.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOPP vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF	14.81%	22.61%	9.89%	4.74%	-15.04%	19.35%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	11.94%	15.61%	-12.43%	-8.57%	-8.10%	22.54%

Correlation

The correlation between LOPP and MOO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2021	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between LOPP and MOO has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LOPP vs. MOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LOPP	MOO
Industrials	50.1%	21.7%
Utilities	16.5%	-
Technology	8.5%	-
Basic Materials	6.2%	25.2%
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	-
Energy	3.8%	-
Healthcare	3.4%	15.3%
Real Estate	3.1%	-
Financial Services	2.5%	-
Communication Services	1.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	37.8%

Return for Risk

LOPP vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOPP

LOPP Risk / Return Rank: 60
LOPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LOPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
LOPP Omega Ratio Rank: 52
LOPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LOPP Martin Ratio Rank: 68

MOO

MOO Risk / Return Rank: 28
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOPP vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LOPP	MOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	0.85	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	1.32	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.15	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	1.10	+1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.74	2.84	+6.90

LOPP vs. MOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the MOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOPP and MOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LOPP vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOPP drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOPP and MOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOPP	MOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.28%	-69.53%	+44.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.77%	-11.17%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.28%	-26.83%	+6.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.28%	-39.52%	+14.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.74%	-16.12%	+11.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.12%	-16.98%	+8.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	4.31%	-1.63%

Volatility

LOPP vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) at 4.33%. This indicates that LOPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOPP	MOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	4.33%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.94%	11.10%	+2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.25%	14.39%	+2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.18%	17.18%	+1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.75%	18.13%	-0.38%

LOPP vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOPP has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MOO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOPP vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

LOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than MOO's 2.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF	0.72%	0.83%	1.88%	2.23%	2.01%	1.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	2.21%	2.47%	3.41%	2.93%	2.15%	1.17%	1.10%	1.26%	1.69%	1.44%	2.14%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOPP and MOO in my portfolio?

LOPP and MOO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOPP or MOO?

LOPP has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to MOO (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOPP dropped -25.28% vs MOO's -69.53%.

Which ETF is better, LOPP or MOO?

On 5-year performance, LOPP leads with 7.94% vs 0.16% for MOO. On fees, LOPP is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LOPP or MOO?

Over the 5-year period, LOPP has performed better with a 7.94% return vs 0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOPP or MOO?

LOPP is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for MOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOPP or MOO?

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.72% for LOPP.

What is the main difference between LOPP and MOO?

LOPP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOO is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for LOPP and 0.56% for MOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LOPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.