LOPP vs. FYC
LOPP (Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF) and FYC (First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LOPP is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while FYC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. LOPP is actively managed, while FYC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LOPP returned 7.93%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for FYC. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LOPP charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for FYC.
Performance
LOPP vs. FYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOPP achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly lower than FYC's 21.11% return.
LOPP
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 18.23%
- 1Y
- 35.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- —
FYC
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 24.24%
- 1Y
- 56.37%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.40%
LOPP vs. FYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF | 15.89% | 22.61% | 9.89% | 4.74% | -15.04% | 19.26% |
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 21.11% | 24.24% | 23.99% | 14.52% | -25.86% | 9.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOPP and FYC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between LOPP and FYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
LOPP vs. FYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LOPP
FYC
Industrials
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
LOPP
FYC
Utilities
LOPP
FYC
Financial Services
LOPP
FYC
Consumer Cyclical
LOPP
FYC
Energy
LOPP
FYC
Basic Materials
LOPP
FYC
Technology
LOPP
FYC
Real Estate
LOPP
FYC
Communication Services
LOPP
FYC
Healthcare
LOPP
FYC
Consumer Defensive
LOPP
FYC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOPP vs. FYC — Risk / Return Rank
LOPP
FYC
LOPP vs. FYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOPP | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 2.70 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.04 | 3.61 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.43 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 5.44 | -1.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.40 | 19.85 | -6.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOPP | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.70 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.46 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.54 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
LOPP vs. FYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOPP drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, smaller than the maximum FYC drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOPP and FYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOPP | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -47.85% | +22.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.77% | -10.48% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.28% | -27.79% | +7.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.28% | -35.37% | +10.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.92% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -9.66% | +1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.87% | -0.28% |
Volatility
LOPP vs. FYC - Volatility Comparison
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) at 5.45%. This indicates that LOPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOPP | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 5.45% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 15.06% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.33% | 21.01% | -4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 23.62% | -5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 24.57% | -6.87% |
LOPP vs. FYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOPP has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FYC's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOPP vs. FYC - Dividend Comparison
LOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than FYC's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.72% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.12% | 0.39% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.31% | 0.21% |
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF | 0.72% | 0.83% | 1.88% | 2.23% | 2.01% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOPP and FYC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOPP has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to FYC (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOPP dropped -25.28% vs FYC's -47.85%.
On 5-year performance, FYC leads with 10.76% vs 7.93% for LOPP. On fees, LOPP is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FYC has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FYC has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOPP is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.
LOPP has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.07% for FYC.
LOPP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FYC is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for LOPP and 0.71% for FYC.
FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOPP and FYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer