PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOPP vs. FYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOPP vs. FYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOPP achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly lower than FYC's 21.11% return.


LOPP

1D
2.54%
1M
2.79%
YTD
15.89%
6M
18.23%
1Y
35.23%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*

FYC

1D
0.24%
1M
3.71%
YTD
21.11%
6M
24.24%
1Y
56.37%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
14.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOPP vs. FYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LOPP
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF
15.89%22.61%9.89%4.74%-15.04%19.26%
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
21.11%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between LOPP and FYC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2021

0.84

The correlation between LOPP and FYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

LOPP vs. FYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LOPP
FYC

Industrials

62.6%
13.4%

Utilities

11.2%
1.5%

Financial Services

6.3%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
9.9%

Energy

3.9%
3.4%

Basic Materials

3.5%
3.4%

Technology

3.2%
13.7%

Real Estate

2.6%
8.4%

Communication Services

1.5%
3.4%

Healthcare

0.8%
27.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
3.8%

Industrials

LOPP
62.6%
FYC
13.4%

Utilities

LOPP
11.2%
FYC
1.5%

Financial Services

LOPP
6.3%
FYC
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

LOPP
4.0%
FYC
9.9%

Energy

LOPP
3.9%
FYC
3.4%

Basic Materials

LOPP
3.5%
FYC
3.4%

Technology

LOPP
3.2%
FYC
13.7%

Real Estate

LOPP
2.6%
FYC
8.4%

Communication Services

LOPP
1.5%
FYC
3.4%

Healthcare

LOPP
0.8%
FYC
27.9%

Consumer Defensive

LOPP
0.5%
FYC
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOPP vs. FYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOPP
LOPP Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LOPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOPP Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
LOPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOPP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOPP vs. FYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOPPFYCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.17

2.70

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

3.61

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

5.44

-1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.40

19.85

-6.44

LOPP vs. FYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOPP Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FYC Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOPP and FYC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOPPFYCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.70

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.46

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.54

+0.02

Drawdowns

LOPP vs. FYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOPP drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, smaller than the maximum FYC drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOPP and FYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOPPFYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.28%

-47.85%

+22.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.77%

-10.48%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.28%

-27.79%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.28%

-35.37%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.92%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-9.66%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.87%

-0.28%

Volatility

LOPP vs. FYC - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) at 5.45%. This indicates that LOPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOPPFYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

5.45%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

15.06%

-1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.33%

21.01%

-4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.99%

23.62%

-5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.70%

24.57%

-6.87%

LOPP vs. FYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOPP has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FYC's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOPP vs. FYC - Dividend Comparison

LOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than FYC's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.07%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
LOPP
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF
0.72%0.83%1.88%2.23%2.01%1.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOPP and FYC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOPP has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to FYC (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOPP dropped -25.28% vs FYC's -47.85%.

On 5-year performance, FYC leads with 10.76% vs 7.93% for LOPP. On fees, LOPP is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FYC has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FYC has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LOPP is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

LOPP has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.07% for FYC.

LOPP is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FYC is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for LOPP and 0.71% for FYC.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOPP and FYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer