PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LONZ vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LONZ vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LONZ vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LONZ achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's -0.92% return.


LONZ

1D
0.47%
1M
1.00%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
0.65%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
10Y*

PYLD

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
0.90%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LONZ vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LONZ has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LONZ vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LONZ
LONZ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LONZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LONZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LONZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LONZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LONZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LONZ vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ) and PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LONZPYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

1.72

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

2.39

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.84

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.06

7.60

+0.46

LONZ vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LONZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LONZ and PYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LONZPYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.72

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.24

1.99

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between LONZ and PYLD is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LONZ vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

LONZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than PYLD's 6.36% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
LONZ
PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund
7.27%6.60%8.16%8.29%3.33%
PYLD
PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
6.36%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%

Drawdowns

LONZ vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LONZ drawdown since its inception was -4.19%, smaller than the maximum PYLD drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LONZ and PYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LONZPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-4.52%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.44%

-3.25%

-0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-2.28%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-0.64%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

0.79%

-0.16%

Volatility

LONZ vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Senior Loan Active Exchange-Traded Fund (LONZ) is 1.22%, while PIMCO ETF Trust - PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that LONZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LONZPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.61%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

2.12%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

3.43%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.26%

4.00%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.26%

4.00%

-0.74%