PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LONGX vs. CRIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LONGX vs. CRIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LONGX having a 12.82% return and CRIHX slightly lower at 12.61%.


LONGX

1D
-0.06%
1M
3.49%
YTD
12.82%
6M
10.82%
1Y
16.55%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
24.95%

CRIHX

1D
-1.18%
1M
3.40%
YTD
12.61%
6M
11.47%
1Y
18.79%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LONGX vs. CRIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LONGX
Longboard Alternative Growth Fund
12.82%1.49%14.95%5.64%-13.21%13.89%27.70%13.82%270.32%19.08%
CRIHX
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund
12.61%-1.55%17.72%6.06%-4.24%5.91%20.44%12.95%-8.43%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LONGX and CRIHX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2016

0.63

The correlation between LONGX and CRIHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LONGX vs. CRIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LONGX
LONGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LONGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LONGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
LONGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LONGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LONGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

CRIHX
CRIHX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CRIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CRIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LONGX vs. CRIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) and CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LONGXCRIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.23

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

6.84

+2.35

LONGX vs. CRIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LONGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the CRIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LONGX and CRIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LONGX vs. CRIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LONGX drawdown since its inception was -77.16%, which is greater than CRIHX's maximum drawdown of -21.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LONGX and CRIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LONGXCRIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.16%

-21.33%

-55.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-9.07%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.57%

-15.87%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

-15.87%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-1.18%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-4.11%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.96%

-1.12%

Volatility

LONGX vs. CRIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Longboard Alternative Growth Fund (LONGX) is 3.22%, while CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund (CRIHX) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that LONGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LONGXCRIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

5.87%

-2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

10.45%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

13.85%

-2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.91%

11.30%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

137.79%

11.17%

+126.62%

LONGX vs. CRIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LONGX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CRIHX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

LONGX vs. CRIHX - Dividend Comparison

Neither LONGX nor CRIHX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CRIHX
CRM Long/Short Opportunities Fund
0.00%0.00%8.11%2.32%1.55%0.75%8.83%0.03%1.75%0.24%0.00%
LONGX
Longboard Alternative Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%5.40%7.64%1.73%0.00%0.00%3.10%268.50%23.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


LONGX and CRIHX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRIHX has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to LONGX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LONGX dropped -77.16% vs CRIHX's -21.33%.

LONGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LONGX and CRIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer