PortfoliosLab logo
ASML.AS vs. KLAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ASML.AS and KLAC is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ASML.AS vs. KLAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ASML.AS:

-0.58

KLAC:

0.03

Sortino Ratio

ASML.AS:

-0.83

KLAC:

0.34

Omega Ratio

ASML.AS:

0.89

KLAC:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

ASML.AS:

-0.69

KLAC:

-0.01

Martin Ratio

ASML.AS:

-1.05

KLAC:

-0.02

Ulcer Index

ASML.AS:

29.34%

KLAC:

19.14%

Daily Std Dev

ASML.AS:

43.17%

KLAC:

49.61%

Max Drawdown

ASML.AS:

-89.99%

KLAC:

-83.74%

Current Drawdown

ASML.AS:

-34.91%

KLAC:

-13.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASML.AS:

€256.77B

KLAC:

$100.83B

EPS

ASML.AS:

€22.10

KLAC:

$27.52

PE Ratio

ASML.AS:

29.24

KLAC:

27.70

PEG Ratio

ASML.AS:

1.44

KLAC:

1.44

PS Ratio

ASML.AS:

8.36

KLAC:

8.73

PB Ratio

ASML.AS:

14.69

KLAC:

25.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASML.AS:

€30.71B

KLAC:

$11.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASML.AS:

€15.98B

KLAC:

$7.03B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASML.AS achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than KLAC's 21.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ASML.AS has underperformed KLAC with an annualized return of 21.91%, while KLAC has yielded a comparatively higher 32.12% annualized return.


ASML.AS

YTD

-4.28%

1M

6.13%

6M

-2.18%

1Y

-25.09%

3Y*

8.16%

5Y*

17.02%

10Y*

21.91%

KLAC

YTD

21.56%

1M

9.47%

6M

15.01%

1Y

1.32%

3Y*

29.53%

5Y*

34.15%

10Y*

32.12%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASML Holding NV

KLA Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ASML.AS vs. KLAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASML.AS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASML.AS is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASML.AS is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASML.AS is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASML.AS is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASML.AS is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASML.AS is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

KLAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KLAC is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KLAC is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KLAC is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KLAC is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KLAC is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KLAC is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ASML.AS vs. KLAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ASML.AS Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the KLAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASML.AS and KLAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ASML.AS vs. KLAC - Dividend Comparison

ASML.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than KLAC's 0.89% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ASML.AS
ASML Holding NV
0.99%0.92%0.87%1.28%0.47%0.64%1.19%1.02%0.83%0.98%0.85%0.68%
KLAC
KLA Corporation
0.89%0.96%0.92%1.25%0.91%1.35%1.74%3.17%2.15%2.67%2.94%26.17%

Drawdowns

ASML.AS vs. KLAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASML.AS drawdown since its inception was -89.99%, which is greater than KLAC's maximum drawdown of -83.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML.AS and KLAC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ASML.AS vs. KLAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ASML Holding NV (ASML.AS) is 9.53%, while KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a volatility of 11.98%. This indicates that ASML.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ASML.AS vs. KLAC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding NV and KLA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
7.74B
3.06B
(ASML.AS) Total Revenue
(KLAC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ASML.AS values in EUR, KLAC values in USD

ASML.AS vs. KLAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ASML Holding NV and KLA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
54.0%
61.6%
(ASML.AS) Gross Margin
(KLAC) Gross Margin
ASML.AS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, ASML Holding NV reported a gross profit of 4.18B and revenue of 7.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.

KLAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.89B and revenue of 3.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

ASML.AS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, ASML Holding NV reported an operating income of 2.74B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.4%.

KLAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.30B and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.

ASML.AS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, ASML Holding NV reported a net income of 2.36B and revenue of 7.74B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.

KLAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 3.06B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.