LOGSX vs. FSHCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LOGSX (Live Oak Health Sciences Fund) and FSHCX (Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LOGSX returned 6.37%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for FSHCX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOGSX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for FSHCX.

Performance

LOGSX vs. FSHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) and Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOGSX achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly lower than FSHCX's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, LOGSX has underperformed FSHCX with an annualized return of 6.37%, while FSHCX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.22% annualized return.

LOGSX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: -3.06%
• 6M: -2.57%
• 1Y: 13.04%
• 3Y*: 7.87%
• 5Y*: 5.71%
• 10Y*: 6.37%

FSHCX

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 1.77%
• 6M: 2.10%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: -1.01%
• 5Y*: -0.25%
• 10Y*: 8.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOGSX vs. FSHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LOGSX Live Oak Health Sciences Fund	-3.06%	19.63%	0.16%	1.21%	3.71%	17.59%	6.01%	18.98%	-3.84%	13.42%
FSHCX Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio	1.77%	3.85%	-13.21%	1.52%	0.86%	20.22%	18.58%	19.91%	10.17%	24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LOGSX and FSHCX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2001	0.74

The correlation between LOGSX and FSHCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LOGSX vs. FSHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOGSX

LOGSX Risk / Return Rank: 14
LOGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LOGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
LOGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
LOGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
LOGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

FSHCX

FSHCX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FSHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FSHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FSHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FSHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FSHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOGSX vs. FSHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) and Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOGSX	FSHCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	0.26	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	0.47	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.07	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	0.31	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.23	0.79	+3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOGSX vs. FSHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the FSHCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOGSX and FSHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOGSX	FSHCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	0.26	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	-0.01	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.38	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.54	-0.11

Drawdowns

LOGSX vs. FSHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOGSX drawdown since its inception was -45.85%, smaller than the maximum FSHCX drawdown of -57.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGSX and FSHCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOGSX	FSHCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.85%	-57.81%	+11.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.13%	-17.15%	+9.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.33%	-29.52%	+15.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.03%	-29.52%	+14.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.28%	-35.48%	+8.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.13%	-12.91%	+4.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.61%	-11.37%	+3.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	6.75%	-3.58%

Volatility

LOGSX vs. FSHCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Live Oak Health Sciences Fund (LOGSX) is 3.70%, while Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that LOGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSHCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOGSX	FSHCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	4.66%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.07%	15.20%	-5.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	20.34%	-6.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.19%	19.17%	-4.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.13%	21.47%	-5.34%

LOGSX vs. FSHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOGSX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FSHCX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOGSX vs. FSHCX - Dividend Comparison

LOGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than FSHCX's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSHCX Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio	0.74%	0.75%	16.63%	0.57%	5.32%	7.09%	0.76%	0.27%	12.92%	13.41%	4.62%	4.06%
LOGSX Live Oak Health Sciences Fund	2.14%	2.07%	2.64%	6.28%	0.55%	7.02%	7.04%	0.85%	15.20%	6.45%	2.10%	15.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOGSX and FSHCX in my portfolio?

LOGSX and FSHCX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOGSX or FSHCX?

FSHCX has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to LOGSX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOGSX dropped -45.85% vs FSHCX's -57.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LOGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.