FSHCX vs. FSPHX
FSHCX (Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio) and FSPHX (Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSHCX returned 9.01%/yr vs 9.36%/yr for FSPHX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSHCX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FSPHX.
Performance
FSHCX vs. FSPHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSHCX achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly higher than FSPHX's -0.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSHCX having a 9.01% annualized return and FSPHX not far ahead at 9.36%.
FSHCX
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 9.35%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
FSPHX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- -8.58%
- 1Y
- 12.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
FSHCX vs. FSPHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHCX Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio | 9.35% | 3.85% | -13.21% | 1.52% | 0.86% | 20.22% | 18.58% | 19.91% | 10.17% | 24.46% |
FSPHX Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio | -0.38% | 9.36% | 4.91% | 4.13% | -12.82% | 11.58% | 24.57% | 31.48% | 7.15% | 23.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSHCX and FSPHX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1986 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSHCX and FSPHX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSHCX vs. FSPHX — Risk / Return Rank
FSHCX
FSPHX
FSHCX vs. FSPHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX) and Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSHCX | FSPHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.14 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 0.70 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.07 | 1.50 | +0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSHCX vs. FSPHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSHCX drawdown since its inception was -57.81%, which is greater than FSPHX's maximum drawdown of -44.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHCX and FSPHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSHCX | FSPHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.81% | -44.45% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.15% | -18.32% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.52% | -18.32% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.52% | -29.31% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.48% | -29.31% | -6.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.43% | -9.91% | +3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -9.83% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.75% | 8.56% | -1.81% |
Volatility
FSHCX vs. FSPHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio (FSHCX) is 5.18%, while Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that FSHCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSHCX | FSPHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 6.03% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.44% | 14.93% | +0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.72% | 18.12% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 18.42% | +0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 19.05% | +2.45% |
FSHCX vs. FSPHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSHCX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPHX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSHCX vs. FSPHX - Dividend Comparison
FSHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than FSPHX's 12.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHCX Fidelity Select Health Care Services Portfolio | 0.69% | 0.75% | 16.63% | 0.57% | 5.32% | 7.09% | 0.76% | 0.27% | 12.92% | 13.41% | 4.62% | 4.06% |
FSPHX Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio | 12.23% | 4.16% | 10.77% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 9.06% | 11.29% | 1.35% | 9.02% | 2.27% | 0.18% | 11.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSHCX and FSPHX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSPHX has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to FSHCX (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHCX dropped -57.81% vs FSPHX's -44.45%.
FSPHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSHCX and FSPHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer