LOGS.DE vs. XDG7.DE
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and XDG7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both Energy Equities funds - LOGS.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+ while XDG7.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LOGS.DE returned 24.55%/yr vs 4.63%/yr for XDG7.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XDG7.DE.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 31.31% return, which is significantly lower than XDG7.DE's 34.27% return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
XDG7.DE
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 34.27%
- 6M
- 33.93%
- 1Y
- 72.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOGS.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | -4.19% |
XDG7.DE Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 34.27% | 23.57% | -15.19% | -25.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and XDG7.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023 | 0.47 |
The correlation between LOGS.DE and XDG7.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. XDG7.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
XDG7.DE
LOGS.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGS.DE | XDG7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.56 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.83 | 4.19 | +5.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.29 | 10.86 | +23.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGS.DE | XDG7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 2.40 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.06 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, which is greater than XDG7.DE's maximum drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and XDG7.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | XDG7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -48.68% | -7.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -17.21% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -43.66% | +22.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -2.95% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -26.59% | +11.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 6.64% | -4.77% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) is 6.06%, while Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that LOGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDG7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | XDG7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 7.88% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 13.49% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 30.00% | -12.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 24.08% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 24.08% | +0.01% |
LOGS.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XDG7.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGS.DE nor XDG7.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and XDG7.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XDG7.DE.
LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while XDG7.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.35% for XDG7.DE.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and XDG7.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer