LOGS.DE vs. G1CD.DE
LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and G1CD.DE (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist) are both Energy Equities funds - LOGS.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+ while G1CD.DE tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LOGS.DE returned 24.55%/yr vs 5.13%/yr for G1CD.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOGS.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for G1CD.DE.
Performance
LOGS.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGS.DE achieves a 31.31% return, which is significantly lower than G1CD.DE's 35.16% return.
LOGS.DE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 31.31%
- 6M
- 30.73%
- 1Y
- 64.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.55%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
G1CD.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 35.16%
- 6M
- 37.55%
- 1Y
- 83.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOGS.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 31.31% | 44.49% | -2.07% | 2.19% | 17.41% |
G1CD.DE Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 35.16% | 28.09% | -22.10% | -13.60% | -7.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGS.DE and G1CD.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022 | 0.45 |
The correlation between LOGS.DE and G1CD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGS.DE vs. G1CD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LOGS.DE
G1CD.DE
LOGS.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGS.DE | G1CD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.62 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.83 | 7.85 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.29 | 27.83 | +6.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGS.DE | G1CD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.73 | 3.90 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.07 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
LOGS.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGS.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.42%, smaller than the maximum G1CD.DE drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGS.DE and G1CD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGS.DE | G1CD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.42% | -64.00% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.50% | -10.60% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.16% | -52.73% | +31.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | -16.50% | +11.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -35.01% | +19.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 3.00% | -1.13% |
Volatility
LOGS.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) is 6.06%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that LOGS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than G1CD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGS.DE | G1CD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 8.16% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.34% | 14.33% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 21.33% | -4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 25.12% | -3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 25.12% | -1.03% |
LOGS.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGS.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than G1CD.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGS.DE vs. G1CD.DE - Dividend Comparison
LOGS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while G1CD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G1CD.DE Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 1.52% | 2.08% | 1.37% | 0.70% | 0.09% |
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGS.DE and G1CD.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for G1CD.DE.
LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+, while G1CD.DE tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LOGS.DE and 0.60% for G1CD.DE.
Find the right allocation for LOGS.DE and G1CD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer