PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
G1CD.DE vs. XDG7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

G1CD.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with G1CD.DE having a 35.16% return and XDG7.DE slightly lower at 34.27%.


G1CD.DE

1D
-0.69%
1M
3.11%
YTD
35.16%
6M
37.55%
1Y
83.64%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
10Y*

XDG7.DE

1D
-2.33%
1M
2.75%
YTD
34.27%
6M
33.93%
1Y
72.40%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

G1CD.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
G1CD.DE
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist
35.16%28.09%-22.10%-21.77%
XDG7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C
34.27%23.57%-15.19%-25.56%

Correlation

The correlation between G1CD.DE and XDG7.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023

0.89

The correlation between G1CD.DE and XDG7.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

G1CD.DE vs. XDG7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

G1CD.DE
G1CD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
G1CD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G1CD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
G1CD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
G1CD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
G1CD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XDG7.DE
XDG7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDG7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

G1CD.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


G1CD.DEXDG7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.56

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.85

4.19

+3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.83

10.86

+16.96

G1CD.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current G1CD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.90, which is higher than the XDG7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of G1CD.DE and XDG7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


G1CD.DEXDG7.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90

2.40

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.06

+0.01

Drawdowns

G1CD.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum G1CD.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.00%, which is greater than XDG7.DE's maximum drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for G1CD.DE and XDG7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


G1CD.DEXDG7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.00%

-48.68%

-15.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-17.21%

+6.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.73%

-43.66%

-9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.50%

-2.95%

-13.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.01%

-26.59%

-8.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

6.64%

-3.64%

Volatility

G1CD.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (G1CD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDG7.DE) have volatilities of 8.16% and 7.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


G1CD.DEXDG7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.16%

7.88%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

13.49%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

30.00%

-8.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

24.08%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.12%

24.08%

+1.04%

G1CD.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

G1CD.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XDG7.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

G1CD.DE vs. XDG7.DE - Dividend Comparison

G1CD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while XDG7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
G1CD.DE
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist
1.52%2.08%1.37%0.70%0.09%
XDG7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Global SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


G1CD.DE and XDG7.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDG7.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDG7.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for G1CD.DE.

G1CD.DE tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation, while XDG7.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Select. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for G1CD.DE and 0.35% for XDG7.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for G1CD.DE and XDG7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer