LOGO vs. RSHO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LOGO (Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF) and RSHO (Tema American Reshoring ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LOGO returned -0.59% vs 57.71% for RSHO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOGO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RSHO.

Performance

LOGO vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOGO achieves a -4.57% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 33.69% return.

LOGO

• 1D: -5.22%
• 1M: -2.53%
• YTD: -4.57%
• 6M: -5.00%
• 1Y: -0.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSHO

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 7.69%
• YTD: 33.69%
• 6M: 33.85%
• 1Y: 57.71%
• 3Y*: 31.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOGO vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF	-4.57%	5.34%
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	33.69%	18.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LOGO and RSHO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

LOGO vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOGO

LOGO Risk / Return Rank: 9
LOGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
LOGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
LOGO Omega Ratio Rank: 8
LOGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
LOGO Martin Ratio Rank: 9

RSHO

RSHO Risk / Return Rank: 73
RSHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RSHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
RSHO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RSHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RSHO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOGO vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LOGO	RSHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	2.44	-2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	3.28	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.40	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	3.96	-3.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.08	15.16	-15.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LOGO vs. RSHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOGO Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the RSHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOGO and RSHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LOGO	RSHO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04	2.44	-2.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	1.48	-1.44

Drawdowns

LOGO vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOGO drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum RSHO drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGO and RSHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOGO	RSHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.34%	-27.31%	+8.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.34%	-14.64%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.04%	0.00%	-11.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-4.32%	-1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.36%	3.82%	+3.54%

Volatility

LOGO vs. RSHO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) is 6.55%, while Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that LOGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LOGO	RSHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.55%	9.22%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.91%	20.09%	-8.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.91%	23.74%	-8.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.86%	22.55%	-7.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	22.55%	-7.69%

LOGO vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOGO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than RSHO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOGO vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison

LOGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSHO Tema American Reshoring ETF	0.22%	0.30%	0.26%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOGO and RSHO in my portfolio?

LOGO and RSHO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LOGO or RSHO?

RSHO has higher volatility (9.22%) compared to LOGO (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOGO dropped -18.34% vs RSHO's -27.31%.

Which ETF is better, LOGO or RSHO?

On 1-year performance, RSHO leads with 57.71% vs -0.59% for LOGO. On fees, LOGO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, LOGO has been the lower-risk option at 6.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LOGO or RSHO?

Over the 1-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 57.71% return vs -0.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOGO or RSHO?

LOGO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOGO or RSHO?

RSHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.00% for LOGO.

What is the main difference between LOGO and RSHO?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Brands and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for LOGO and 0.75% for RSHO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.