LOGO vs. GSG
LOGO (Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - LOGO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Brands, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. LOGO is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past year, LOGO returned -1.07% vs 27.68% for GSG. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. LOGO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
LOGO vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGO achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 22.42% return.
LOGO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 6M
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- -1.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- -15.10%
- YTD
- 22.42%
- 6M
- 21.05%
- 1Y
- 27.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
LOGO vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF | -4.41% | 4.84% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 22.42% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGO and GSG is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGO vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
LOGO
GSG
LOGO vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOGO | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.23 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 1.48 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 6.67 | -6.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOGO vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGO drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGO and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGO | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -89.62% | +71.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.34% | -18.81% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.90% | -63.04% | +52.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -63.69% | +57.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 4.16% | +3.48% |
Volatility
LOGO vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) has a higher volatility of 8.75% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 5.75%. This indicates that LOGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGO | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.75% | 5.75% | +3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 20.98% | -7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 22.98% | -6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 22.70% | -6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 22.02% | -6.27% |
LOGO vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGO vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGO nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGO and GSG have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOGO has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to GSG (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOGO dropped -18.34% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 27.68% vs -1.07% for LOGO. On fees, LOGO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, GSG has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 27.68% return vs -1.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOGO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
LOGO and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
LOGO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Brands and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for LOGO and 0.75% for GSG.
GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOGO and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer