LOGO vs. GSG
LOGO (Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - LOGO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Brands, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. LOGO is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past year, LOGO returned -1.09% vs 37.41% for GSG. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. LOGO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
LOGO vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGO achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 33.95% return.
LOGO
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 1Y
- -1.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- 6M
- 29.74%
- YTD
- 33.95%
- 1Y
- 37.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
LOGO vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF | -2.68% | 4.84% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 33.95% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGO and GSG is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGO vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
LOGO
GSG
LOGO vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOGO | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.00 | -2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | 6.66 | -6.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOGO vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGO drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGO and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGO | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -89.62% | +71.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.34% | -18.81% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.29% | -59.56% | +50.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -63.68% | +57.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.91% | 5.63% | +2.28% |
Volatility
LOGO vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) is 4.18%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that LOGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGO | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 7.17% | -2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.49% | 21.54% | -8.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 23.48% | -7.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 22.80% | -7.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 22.00% | -6.40% |
LOGO vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGO vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOGO nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGO and GSG have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to LOGO (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOGO dropped -18.34% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 37.41% vs -1.09% for LOGO. On fees, LOGO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, LOGO has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 37.41% return vs -1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOGO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
LOGO and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
LOGO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Brands and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for LOGO and 0.75% for GSG.
GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOGO and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer