LOGO vs. DIG
LOGO (Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF) and DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) are both exchange-traded funds - LOGO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Brands, while DIG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%). LOGO is actively managed, while DIG is passively managed. Over the past year, LOGO returned 4.09% vs 98.04% for DIG. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. LOGO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DIG.
Performance
LOGO vs. DIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOGO achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 66.82% return.
LOGO
- 1D
- 5.13%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- 66.82%
- 6M
- 58.48%
- 1Y
- 98.04%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 28.36%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
LOGO vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF | 0.33% | 5.34% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 66.82% | 19.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOGO and DIG is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOGO vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank
LOGO
DIG
LOGO vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOGO | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.35 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 4.23 | -4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 11.54 | -10.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOGO | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 2.43 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | -0.00 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
LOGO vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOGO drawdown since its inception was -18.34%, smaller than the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOGO and DIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOGO | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.34% | -97.04% | +78.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.34% | -23.29% | +4.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -51.13% | +44.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -64.36% | +58.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.37% | 8.52% | -1.15% |
Volatility
LOGO vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) is 8.32%, while ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) has a volatility of 16.57%. This indicates that LOGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOGO | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 16.57% | -8.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.93% | 33.00% | -20.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 40.83% | -25.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 51.59% | -35.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 57.80% | -42.12% |
LOGO vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOGO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOGO vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison
LOGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.49% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
LOGO Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOGO and DIG have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIG has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to LOGO (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOGO dropped -18.34% vs DIG's -97.04%.
On 1-year performance, DIG leads with 98.04% vs 4.09% for LOGO. On fees, LOGO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, LOGO has been the lower-risk option at 8.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DIG has performed better with a 98.04% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOGO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DIG.
DIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for LOGO.
LOGO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DIG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Brands and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for LOGO and 0.95% for DIG.
DIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOGO and DIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer