PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOG.MC vs. NVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOG.MC vs. NVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Cia de Distribucion Integral (LOG.MC) and Novartis AG (NVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LOG.MC is traded in EUR, while NVS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LOG.MC having a 13.18% return and NVS slightly higher at 13.67%. Over the past 10 years, LOG.MC has outperformed NVS with an annualized return of 11.41%, while NVS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.


LOG.MC

1D
0.87%
1M
0.18%
YTD
13.18%
6M
19.62%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
19.12%
5Y*
20.28%
10Y*
11.41%

NVS

1D
1.32%
1M
2.52%
YTD
13.67%
6M
17.52%
1Y
29.62%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOG.MC vs. NVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOG.MC
Cia de Distribucion Integral
13.18%10.93%28.11%9.98%44.00%18.56%-15.45%-3.66%19.45%-9.71%
NVS
Novartis AG
13.67%29.51%6.62%12.65%14.76%3.55%-5.17%16.49%10.92%4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between LOG.MC and NVS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014

0.19

The correlation between LOG.MC and NVS shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOG.MC vs. NVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOG.MC
LOG.MC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LOG.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOG.MC vs. NVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cia de Distribucion Integral (LOG.MC) and Novartis AG (NVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOG.MCNVSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.27

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.57

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.82

6.62

+1.20

LOG.MC vs. NVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOG.MC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the NVS Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOG.MC and NVS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOG.MCNVSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.51

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

0.88

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.51

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.54

+0.13

Drawdowns

LOG.MC vs. NVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOG.MC drawdown since its inception was -42.20%, which is greater than NVS's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOG.MC and NVS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOG.MCNVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.20%

-34.96%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-11.59%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.71%

-14.97%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.12%

-14.97%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.20%

-25.54%

-16.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

-6.54%

+2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-9.62%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

4.49%

-1.71%

Volatility

LOG.MC vs. NVS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cia de Distribucion Integral (LOG.MC) is 4.52%, while Novartis AG (NVS) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that LOG.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOG.MCNVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

6.33%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

13.66%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

19.66%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

18.33%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

19.66%

-0.30%

Dividends

LOG.MC vs. NVS - Dividend Comparison

LOG.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than NVS's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOG.MC
Cia de Distribucion Integral
6.42%6.94%6.58%5.88%5.34%6.85%6.13%4.59%4.08%4.01%2.76%3.30%
NVS
Novartis AG
3.20%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%

Financials

LOG.MC vs. NVS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cia de Distribucion Integral and Novartis AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LOG.MC values in EUR, NVS values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


LOG.MC and NVS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOG.MC and NVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer