PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOG.MC vs. MNG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOG.MC vs. MNG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Cia de Distribucion Integral (LOG.MC) and M&G plc (MNG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LOG.MC is traded in EUR, while MNG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MNG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOG.MC achieves a 20.49% return, which is significantly lower than MNG.L's 30.67% return.


LOG.MC

1D
0.46%
1M
3.34%
6M
15.50%
YTD
20.49%
1Y
36.16%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
22.49%
10Y*
12.75%
ALL TIME*
14.96%

MNG.L

1D
-1.67%
1M
7.15%
6M
23.07%
YTD
30.67%
1Y
47.93%
3Y*
31.50%
5Y*
19.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOG.MC vs. MNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LOG.MC
Cia de Distribucion Integral
20.49%10.93%28.11%9.98%44.00%18.56%-14.03%7.89%
MNG.L
M&G plc
30.67%50.18%2.03%33.95%-2.77%17.06%-16.15%9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LOG.MC and MNG.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2019

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOG.MC vs. MNG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOG.MC
LOG.MC Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LOG.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MNG.L
MNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOG.MC vs. MNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cia de Distribucion Integral (LOG.MC) and M&G plc (MNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOG.MCMNG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

4.12

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.83

15.19

-1.36

LOG.MC vs. MNG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOG.MC Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the MNG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOG.MC and MNG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOG.MC vs. MNG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOG.MC drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, smaller than the maximum MNG.L drawdown of -66.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOG.MC and MNG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOG.MCMNG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.52%

-66.82%

+25.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-11.57%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.71%

-20.22%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.12%

-30.56%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.67%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-11.02%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.15%

-0.56%

Volatility

LOG.MC vs. MNG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cia de Distribucion Integral (LOG.MC) is 3.62%, while M&G plc (MNG.L) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that LOG.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOG.MCMNG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

4.34%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

15.24%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

19.15%

-4.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.69%

24.73%

-8.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

37.71%

-18.49%

Dividends

LOG.MC vs. MNG.L - Dividend Comparison

LOG.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than MNG.L's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOG.MC
Cia de Distribucion Integral
6.03%6.94%6.58%5.88%5.34%6.85%7.57%5.67%5.03%4.96%3.41%4.12%
MNG.L
M&G plc
5.90%7.05%10.01%8.95%9.80%9.19%4.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LOG.MC vs. MNG.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cia de Distribucion Integral and M&G plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. LOG.MC values in EUR, MNG.L values in GBP

Frequently Asked Questions


LOG.MC and MNG.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOG.MC and MNG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer