PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOG.MC vs. FCC.MC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOG.MC vs. FCC.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Cia de Distribucion Integral (LOG.MC) and Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A. (FCC.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOG.MC achieves a 20.49% return, which is significantly higher than FCC.MC's 10.32% return. Over the past 10 years, LOG.MC has outperformed FCC.MC with an annualized return of 12.75%, while FCC.MC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.


LOG.MC

1D
0.46%
1M
3.34%
6M
15.50%
YTD
20.49%
1Y
36.16%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
22.49%
10Y*
12.75%
ALL TIME*
14.96%

FCC.MC

1D
-1.18%
1M
1.15%
6M
11.33%
YTD
10.32%
1Y
5.72%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
9.68%
ALL TIME*
-1.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOG.MC vs. FCC.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOG.MC
Cia de Distribucion Integral
20.49%10.93%28.11%9.98%44.00%18.56%-14.03%-2.59%20.78%-8.94%
FCC.MC
Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A.
10.32%29.23%-35.60%70.94%-12.55%31.12%-12.26%-3.32%35.57%14.30%

Correlation

The correlation between LOG.MC and FCC.MC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2014

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOG.MC vs. FCC.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOG.MC
LOG.MC Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
LOG.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOG.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FCC.MC
FCC.MC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FCC.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCC.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCC.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FCC.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCC.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOG.MC vs. FCC.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cia de Distribucion Integral (LOG.MC) and Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A. (FCC.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOG.MCFCC.MCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.06

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

0.41

+3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.83

1.00

+12.83

LOG.MC vs. FCC.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOG.MC Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the FCC.MC Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOG.MC and FCC.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOG.MC vs. FCC.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOG.MC drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, smaller than the maximum FCC.MC drawdown of -86.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOG.MC and FCC.MC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOG.MCFCC.MCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.52%

-86.66%

+45.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-13.76%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.71%

-42.86%

+30.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.12%

-42.86%

+24.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.52%

-44.57%

+3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-30.03%

+30.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

-57.08%

+49.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

5.69%

-3.10%

Volatility

LOG.MC vs. FCC.MC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cia de Distribucion Integral (LOG.MC) is 3.62%, while Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A. (FCC.MC) has a volatility of 8.09%. This indicates that LOG.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCC.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOG.MCFCC.MCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

8.09%

-4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

15.44%

-3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

20.15%

-5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.69%

29.48%

-12.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

29.71%

-10.49%

Dividends

LOG.MC vs. FCC.MC - Dividend Comparison

LOG.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than FCC.MC's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCC.MC
Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A.
4.27%4.54%5.92%2.78%10.12%3.61%4.55%3.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LOG.MC
Cia de Distribucion Integral
6.03%6.94%6.58%5.88%5.34%6.85%7.57%5.67%5.03%4.96%3.41%4.12%

Financials

LOG.MC vs. FCC.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cia de Distribucion Integral and Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas, S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LOG.MC and FCC.MC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOG.MC and FCC.MC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer