LOFF vs. QTJL
LOFF (Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOFF charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
LOFF vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LOFF
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -47.69%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.23M | $19.42M | $33.43M | |
| $401.55K | $369.04K | $244.27K |
LOFF vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LOFF Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF | -60.77% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | -5.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOFF and QTJL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOFF vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
LOFF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTJL
LOFF vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF (LOFF) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOFF | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOFF vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOFF drawdown since its inception was -70.97%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOFF and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOFF | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.97% | -33.40% | -37.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.97% | -5.68% | -65.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.12% | -7.75% | -38.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.49% | — |
Volatility
LOFF vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOFF | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 169.72% | 11.01% | +158.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.72% | 20.36% | +149.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.72% | 20.26% | +149.46% |
LOFF vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOFF has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOFF vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
LOFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
LOFF Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF | 0.09% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOFF and QTJL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LOFF.
LOFF has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LOFF and 0.79% for QTJL.
Find the right allocation for LOFF and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer