PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LODI vs. JPLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LODI vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LODI achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than JPLD's 1.12% return.


LODI

1D
-0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.30%
1Y
5.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JPLD

1D
0.08%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.52%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LODI vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LODI and JPLD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LODI vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LODI
LODI Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LODI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LODI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LODI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LODI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LODI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLD
JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LODI vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LODIJPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.66

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.82

4.61

+3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.31

21.36

-1.05

LODI vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LODI Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LODI and JPLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LODIJPLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

3.17

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.37

3.26

-0.90

Drawdowns

LODI vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LODI drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum JPLD drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LODI and JPLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LODIJPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.01%

-1.17%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.75%

-1.00%

+0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.04%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.15%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

0.22%

+0.07%

Volatility

LODI vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) is 0.31%, while J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) has a volatility of 0.37%. This indicates that LODI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LODIJPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

0.37%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.08%

0.97%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40%

1.47%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.34%

1.83%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.34%

1.83%

+0.51%

LODI vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LODI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LODI vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

LODI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than JPLD's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
JPLD
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF
4.20%4.24%4.47%1.83%
LODI
AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF
4.96%5.11%0.38%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LODI and JPLD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPLD has higher volatility (0.37%) compared to LODI (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LODI dropped -1.01% vs JPLD's -1.17%.

On 1-year performance, LODI leads with 5.83% vs 4.61% for JPLD. On fees, LODI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LODI has performed better with a 5.83% return vs 4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LODI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPLD.

LODI has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 4.20% for JPLD.

They also come from different issuers: AAM and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LODI and 0.24% for JPLD.

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LODI and JPLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer