LODI vs. BBSB
LODI (AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF) and BBSB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — LODI is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by AAM, while BBSB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. LODI is actively managed, while BBSB is passively managed. Over the past year, LODI returned 6.73% vs 3.48% for BBSB. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LODI charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BBSB.
Performance
LODI vs. BBSB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LODI achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly higher than BBSB's 0.49% return.
LODI
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 6.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBSB
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LODI vs. BBSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LODI AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF | 1.25% | 6.04% | 0.26% |
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF | 0.49% | 5.12% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between LODI and BBSB is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between LODI and BBSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LODI vs. BBSB — Risk / Return Rank
LODI
BBSB
LODI vs. BBSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LODI | BBSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.64 | 2.66 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.95 | 4.32 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.55 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.71 | 4.36 | +4.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.17 | 16.44 | +5.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LODI | BBSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.66 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.32 | 2.44 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
LODI vs. BBSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LODI drawdown since its inception was -1.01%, smaller than the maximum BBSB drawdown of -1.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LODI and BBSB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LODI | BBSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -1.57% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.75% | -0.86% | +0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.24% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -0.31% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | 0.23% | +0.06% |
Volatility
LODI vs. BBSB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF (LODI) is 0.38%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) has a volatility of 0.48%. This indicates that LODI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LODI | BBSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 0.48% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.26% | 0.80% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58% | 1.34% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.42% | 1.68% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.42% | 1.68% | +0.74% |
LODI vs. BBSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LODI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LODI vs. BBSB - Dividend Comparison
LODI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than BBSB's 3.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LODI AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF | 4.99% | 5.11% | 0.38% | 0.00% |
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF | 3.92% | 3.69% | 4.84% | 3.50% |