BSV vs. BLV
BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) and BLV (Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BSV is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while BLV is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BSV returned 1.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BLV. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
BSV vs. BLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BSV having a 0.29% return and BLV slightly lower at 0.28%. Over the past 10 years, BSV has outperformed BLV with an annualized return of 1.95%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively lower 0.99% annualized return.
BSV
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
BLV
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- -0.86%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 2.02%
- 5Y*
- -3.33%
- 10Y*
- 0.99%
BSV vs. BLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.29% | 6.00% | 3.78% | 4.90% | -5.49% | -1.09% | 4.70% | 4.98% | 1.34% | 1.20% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 0.28% | 6.44% | -3.65% | 7.35% | -26.95% | -2.89% | 16.13% | 18.99% | -4.17% | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between BSV and BLV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | 0.65 |
The correlation between BSV and BLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BSV vs. BLV — Risk / Return Rank
BSV
BLV
BSV vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSV | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.14 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 1.15 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 2.92 | +7.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSV | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 0.81 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | -0.26 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.08 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.37 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
BSV vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSV drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum BLV drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSV and BLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSV | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -38.29% | +29.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | -5.73% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.53% | -15.16% | +13.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.54% | -36.27% | +27.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.54% | -38.29% | +29.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -24.14% | +23.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -9.51% | +8.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 2.26% | -1.89% |
Volatility
BSV vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) is 0.52%, while Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that BSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BSV | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.52% | 2.50% | -1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.26% | 5.62% | -4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81% | 8.15% | -6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.72% | 12.97% | -10.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.37% | 11.98% | -9.61% |
BSV vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BSV and BLV have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BSV vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison
BSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than BLV's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.80% | 4.67% | 5.09% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 6.12% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 4.00% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BSV and BLV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLV has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to BSV (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSV dropped -8.54% vs BLV's -38.29%.
On 10-year performance, BSV leads with 1.95% vs 0.99% for BLV. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, BSV has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BSV has performed better with a 1.95% return vs 0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSV and BLV have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
BLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.00% for BSV.
BSV is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BLV is Long-Term Bond. BSV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index, while BLV tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index.
BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BSV and BLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer