PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOCT vs. PJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LOCT vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LOCT vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LOCT
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October
-0.01%5.56%5.21%2.95%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
-1.00%12.78%13.76%7.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOCT achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly higher than PJUL's -1.00% return.


LOCT

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
1.55%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PJUL

1D
1.63%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-1.00%
6M
0.81%
1Y
14.38%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LOCT vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LOCT and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

LOCT vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOCT
LOCT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
LOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
LOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PJUL
PJUL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOCT vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOCTPJULDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

1.43

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

2.17

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

2.10

-1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.32

11.87

-3.55

LOCT vs. PJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOCT Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the PJUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOCT and PJUL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOCTPJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.43

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

0.83

+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between LOCT and PJUL is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LOCT vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison

LOCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, while PJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
LOCT
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October
5.21%5.12%6.27%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PJUL
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%

Drawdowns

LOCT vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOCT drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCT and PJUL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LOCTPJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-18.17%

+13.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.47%

-6.99%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-2.07%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.15%

-1.50%

+1.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

1.24%

-0.65%

Volatility

LOCT vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) is 1.25%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that LOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LOCTPJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

2.90%

-1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.98%

4.16%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.43%

10.09%

-4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.69%

8.58%

-4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.69%

10.12%

-6.43%