LOCT vs. EINC
LOCT (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOCT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. LOCT is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past year, LOCT returned 5.49% vs 30.66% for EINC. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
LOCT vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOCT achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 26.77% return.
LOCT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 28.45%
- YTD
- 26.77%
- 1Y
- 30.66%
- 3Y*
- 28.13%
- 5Y*
- 21.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
LOCT vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOCT Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October | 2.86% | 5.56% | 5.21% | 2.86% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 26.77% | 7.11% | 42.79% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOCT and EINC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.19 |
The correlation between LOCT and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOCT vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
LOCT
EINC
LOCT vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOCT | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.36 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 3.98 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.18 | 9.80 | +14.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOCT vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOCT drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOCT and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOCT | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -87.55% | +82.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.23% | -7.89% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.89% | +3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -44.02% | +43.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 3.20% | -2.97% |
Volatility
LOCT vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October (LOCT) is 0.26%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that LOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOCT | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.26% | 6.16% | -5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.64% | 12.26% | -10.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13% | 15.33% | -13.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 19.58% | -16.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 25.33% | -21.80% |
LOCT vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOCT vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
LOCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than EINC's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.49% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
LOCT Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October | 5.14% | 5.12% | 6.27% | 1.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOCT and EINC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EINC has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to LOCT (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOCT dropped -4.69% vs EINC's -87.55%.
On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 30.66% vs 5.49% for LOCT. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, LOCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 30.66% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LOCT.
LOCT has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 3.49% for EINC.
LOCT is categorized as Options Trading, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LOCT and 0.45% for EINC.
LOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOCT and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer