LNVGY vs. TT
LNVGY (Lenovo Group Limited) and TT (Trane Technologies plc) are both stocks. LNVGY operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while TT operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LNVGY returned 23.64%/yr vs 23.76%/yr for TT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNVGY vs. TT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNVGY achieves a 141.66% return, which is significantly higher than TT's 18.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LNVGY having a 23.64% annualized return and TT not far ahead at 23.76%.
LNVGY
- 1D
- -3.57%
- 1M
- 70.08%
- YTD
- 141.66%
- 6M
- 133.67%
- 1Y
- 147.90%
- 3Y*
- 46.03%
- 5Y*
- 24.78%
- 10Y*
- 23.64%
TT
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 37.71%
- 5Y*
- 21.39%
- 10Y*
- 23.76%
LNVGY vs. TT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNVGY Lenovo Group Limited | 141.66% | -4.37% | -4.30% | 80.46% | -25.77% | 28.05% | 47.80% | 4.62% | 26.37% | 3.11% |
TT Trane Technologies plc | 18.29% | 6.38% | 52.97% | 47.39% | -15.34% | 41.02% | 11.26% | 48.32% | 4.41% | 21.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNVGY and TT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
LNVGY:
$41.74B
TT:
$102.24B
LNVGY:
$2.63
TT:
$12.94
LNVGY:
21.79
TT:
35.43
LNVGY:
5.70
TT:
1.62
LNVGY:
0.50
TT:
4.75
LNVGY:
5.47
TT:
11.87
LNVGY:
$83.00B
TT:
$21.60B
LNVGY:
$12.49B
TT:
$7.76B
LNVGY:
$4.29B
TT:
$4.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNVGY vs. TT — Risk / Return Rank
LNVGY
TT
LNVGY vs. TT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lenovo Group Limited (LNVGY) and Trane Technologies plc (TT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNVGY | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.08 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | 0.45 | +4.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 0.89 | +8.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNVGY vs. TT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNVGY drawdown since its inception was -84.37%, which is greater than TT's maximum drawdown of -77.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNVGY and TT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNVGY | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.37% | -77.91% | -6.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.12% | -19.97% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.60% | -24.44% | -20.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.02% | -40.53% | -14.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.02% | -51.13% | -3.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.68% | -6.75% | -7.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.37% | -14.83% | -20.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.55% | 10.12% | +5.43% |
Volatility
LNVGY vs. TT - Volatility Comparison
Lenovo Group Limited (LNVGY) has a higher volatility of 33.91% compared to Trane Technologies plc (TT) at 9.05%. This indicates that LNVGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNVGY | TT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.91% | 9.05% | +24.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.11% | 21.82% | +19.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.97% | 27.50% | +21.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.51% | 27.38% | +19.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.72% | 28.34% | +12.38% |
Dividends
LNVGY vs. TT - Dividend Comparison
LNVGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than TT's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNVGY Lenovo Group Limited | 1.74% | 4.21% | 3.83% | 3.47% | 5.98% | 3.58% | 3.77% | 5.21% | 4.74% | 10.40% | 10.61% | 3.21% |
TT Trane Technologies plc | 0.87% | 0.97% | 0.91% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 2.10% |
Financials
LNVGY vs. TT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lenovo Group Limited and Trane Technologies plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNVGY vs. TT - Profitability Comparison
LNVGY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lenovo Group Limited reported a gross profit of 3.53B and revenue of 21.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
TT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
LNVGY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lenovo Group Limited reported an operating income of 834.29M and revenue of 21.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.
TT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 776.10M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
LNVGY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lenovo Group Limited reported a net income of 520.10M and revenue of 21.56B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
TT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 584.40M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNVGY and TT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNVGY has higher volatility (33.91%) compared to TT (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNVGY dropped -84.37% vs TT's -77.91%.
LNVGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNVGY and TT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer