LNGX vs. NVIR
LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and NVIR (Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. LNGX is passively managed, while NVIR is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NVIR.
Performance
LNGX vs. NVIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly lower than NVIR's 22.17% return.
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 20.47%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVIR
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 22.17%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 34.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LNGX vs. NVIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 20.47% | 5.97% |
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF | 22.17% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNGX and NVIR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNGX vs. NVIR — Risk / Return Rank
LNGX
NVIR
LNGX vs. NVIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LNGX | NVIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.10 | 0.90 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
LNGX vs. NVIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum NVIR drawdown of -22.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and NVIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNGX | NVIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.31% | -22.47% | +8.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.36% | -3.08% | -8.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -4.58% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.43% | — |
Volatility
LNGX vs. NVIR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNGX | NVIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.67% | 16.05% | +8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 19.24% | +5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 19.24% | +5.43% |
LNGX vs. NVIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than NVIR's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
LNGX vs. NVIR - Dividend Comparison
LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than NVIR's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF | 0.75% | 0.92% | 1.50% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LNGX and NVIR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NVIR.
NVIR has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.85% for NVIR.
Find the right allocation for LNGX and NVIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer