LNGX vs. ISTB
LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and ISTB (iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while ISTB is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ISTB.
Performance
LNGX vs. ISTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than ISTB's 0.53% return.
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISTB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 3.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
LNGX vs. ISTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 14.75% | 5.29% |
ISTB iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF | 0.53% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNGX and ISTB is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNGX vs. ISTB — Risk / Return Rank
LNGX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISTB
LNGX vs. ISTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNGX | ISTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNGX vs. ISTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, which is greater than ISTB's maximum drawdown of -9.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and ISTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNGX | ISTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -9.34% | -8.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.56% | -0.38% | -15.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -1.22% | -3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.34% | — |
Volatility
LNGX vs. ISTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNGX | ISTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.89% | 1.79% | +23.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 2.80% | +22.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 2.51% | +22.38% |
LNGX vs. ISTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ISTB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
LNGX vs. ISTB - Dividend Comparison
LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than ISTB's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISTB iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.25% | 4.12% | 3.83% | 2.97% | 2.01% | 1.69% | 2.20% | 2.75% | 2.57% | 2.06% | 1.90% | 1.58% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LNGX and ISTB have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.
ISTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 0.23% for LNGX.
LNGX is categorized as Energy Equities, while ISTB is Short-Term Bond. LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while ISTB tracks BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.06% for ISTB.
Find the right allocation for LNGX and ISTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer