LNGX vs. HYMB
LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and HYMB (State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while HYMB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HYMB.
Performance
LNGX vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 18.38% return, which is significantly higher than HYMB's 3.26% return.
LNGX
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- YTD
- 18.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYMB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 8.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
LNGX vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 18.38% | 5.29% |
HYMB State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 3.26% | -0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNGX and HYMB is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | -0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNGX vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank
LNGX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYMB
LNGX vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNGX | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNGX vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -17.89%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and HYMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNGX | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.89% | -29.57% | +11.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.89% | -0.79% | -12.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -3.78% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.69% | — |
Volatility
LNGX vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNGX | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.83% | 3.98% | +20.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 6.67% | +18.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 11.36% | +13.47% |
LNGX vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LNGX vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison
LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than HYMB's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMB State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.55% | 4.29% | 4.07% | 3.77% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.95% | 4.03% | 3.78% | 4.08% | 4.54% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.84% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LNGX and HYMB have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYMB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYMB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.
HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.84% for LNGX.
LNGX is categorized as Energy Equities, while HYMB is Municipal Bonds. LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while HYMB tracks ICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.35% for HYMB.
Find the right allocation for LNGX and HYMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer