LNGX vs. EMHC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) and EMHC (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while EMHC is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. LNGX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for EMHC.

Performance

LNGX vs. EMHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than EMHC's 1.93% return.

LNGX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -7.91%
• YTD: 14.75%
• 6M: 14.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMHC

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 10.91%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: 1.55%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNGX vs. EMHC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	14.75%	5.29%
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF	1.93%	0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between LNGX and EMHC is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025	-0.34

Return for Risk

LNGX vs. EMHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNGX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EMHC

EMHC Risk / Return Rank: 65
EMHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
EMHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EMHC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
EMHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
EMHC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNGX vs. EMHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LNGX	EMHC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.99	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.02	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.50	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.44	—

Drawdowns

LNGX vs. EMHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum EMHC drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and EMHC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNGX	EMHC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.71%	-28.03%	+10.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.37%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.56%	-0.55%	-15.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-9.81%	+4.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LNGX	EMHC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.89%	5.52%	+19.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.89%	9.06%	+15.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.89%	8.94%	+15.95%

LNGX vs. EMHC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EMHC's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

LNGX vs. EMHC - Dividend Comparison

LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than EMHC's 6.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF	6.09%	6.16%	5.95%	5.12%	5.11%	2.97%
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF	0.23%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LNGX and EMHC in my portfolio?

LNGX and EMHC have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LNGX or EMHC?

On fees, EMHC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LNGX or EMHC?

EMHC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LNGX or EMHC?

EMHC has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 0.23% for LNGX.

What is the main difference between LNGX and EMHC?

LNGX is categorized as Energy Equities, while EMHC is Emerging Markets Bonds. LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while EMHC tracks Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.23% for EMHC.