PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNGX vs. AIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LNGX vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNGX achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 35.98% return.


LNGX

1D
0.76%
1M
-6.84%
YTD
20.47%
6M
13.78%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIQ

1D
-1.40%
1M
21.10%
YTD
35.98%
6M
36.15%
1Y
69.19%
3Y*
37.50%
5Y*
19.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNGX vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LNGX and AIQ is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNGX vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNGX

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNGX vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LNGX vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LNGXAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.10

0.84

+1.26

Drawdowns

LNGX vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNGX drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, smaller than the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNGX and AIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNGXAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-44.66%

+30.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.36%

-1.40%

-9.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-9.80%

+5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

Volatility

LNGX vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNGXAIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.67%

23.04%

+1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

25.33%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.67%

25.50%

-0.83%

LNGX vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LNGX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

LNGX vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

LNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.14%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%
LNGX
Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF
0.22%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LNGX and AIQ have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

LNGX has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.

LNGX is categorized as Energy Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LNGX and 0.68% for AIQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNGX and AIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer