LNCIX vs. SICIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Ladenburg Income Fund (LNCIX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX).
LNCIX is managed by Ladenburg Thalmann. It was launched on Aug 23, 2015. SICIX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003.
Performance
LNCIX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LNCIX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNCIX Ladenburg Income Fund | -1.48% | 8.91% | 4.47% | 8.46% | -12.62% | 3.11% | 5.76% | 11.70% | -3.64% | 6.07% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 0.36% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNCIX achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LNCIX has underperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 3.09%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.36% annualized return.
LNCIX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LNCIX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LNCIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LNCIX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank
LNCIX
SICIX
LNCIX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladenburg Income Fund (LNCIX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LNCIX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.66 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 2.20 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 2.19 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.17 | 8.95 | -2.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LNCIX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.66 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.84 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.87 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.78 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between LNCIX and SICIX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LNCIX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison
LNCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than SICIX's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNCIX Ladenburg Income Fund | 3.52% | 3.45% | 2.17% | 2.29% | 2.02% | 6.02% | 1.22% | 2.25% | 1.80% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.86% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
LNCIX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNCIX drawdown since its inception was -16.72%, smaller than the maximum SICIX drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNCIX and SICIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNCIX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -27.62% | +10.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.09% | -2.73% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.72% | -10.94% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.72% | -11.61% | -5.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -2.39% | -1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -3.59% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.09% | 0.67% | +0.42% |
Volatility
LNCIX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison
Ladenburg Income Fund (LNCIX) has a higher volatility of 2.22% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 1.24%. This indicates that LNCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LNCIX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 1.24% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.47% | 2.06% | +1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.85% | 3.66% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.77% | 3.87% | +2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.65% | 3.89% | +2.76% |